This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
@ Snappy: I think the version with clear links to the article divided into groups is visually more accessible and should be used. Is there any good reason to use the version with parentheses? MRSC ( talk) 17:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NAVBOX "Each link should clearly be identifiable as such to our readers". "(Council)" is not clear. Why should we mask the name with something that does not tell us where the link goes? MRSC ( talk) 08:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
@ Snappy: I think the version with clear links to the article divided into groups is visually more accessible and should be used. Is there any good reason to use the version with parentheses? MRSC ( talk) 17:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:NAVBOX "Each link should clearly be identifiable as such to our readers". "(Council)" is not clear. Why should we mask the name with something that does not tell us where the link goes? MRSC ( talk) 08:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)