This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles South Africa This template is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles Politics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

@ Lefcentreright: With only 10 articles, I think this template should populate Category:South African government stubs (and possibly Category:Northern Cape stubs) instead of Category:Northern Cape government stubs. The recommended minimum for a new stub type is 60 articles. Alternatively, this template could be moved back to Template:NorthernCape-stub and broadened to apply to all Northern Cape topics, not just the government of the Northern Cape, and the 10 articles could be tagged with both {{ NorthernCape-stub}} and {{ SouthAfrica-gov-stub}}. Thoughts? -- Black Falcon ^{( talk)} 02:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC) reply

@ Black Falcon: Hello, there. My apologies for the VERY late response. I fully support the first option. Regards, Lefcentreright Talk (plz ping) 21:46, 4 June 2020 (UTC) reply