New Zealand Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Template This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Highways: Oceania Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles Template This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This article is supported by the Oceania Highways Task Force.

Is it worth placing those State Highways within auckland into a separate box? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.55.212.97 ( talk) 10:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Why would you do that? Schwede 66 06:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC) reply

What is everyones thoughts about how the routes should be displayed in the navbox? Should they exist as number only or prefixed with SH (as in SH 1)? Also what do we think is the best way to display SH routes that appear in other articles, such as SH 74A? My choice would be to retain status quo format. Ajf773 ( talk) 21:01, 6 July 2016 (UTC) reply

I don't have strong feelings whether "SH" is shown in the navbox or not; it was certainly wrong to delete the spur-numbers, though. "SH 74A" is how I would show it in articles, too. Schwede 66 06:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC) reply