![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Please discuss and give logical explanations as to why you think a certain coach should or should not be included. At the same time, I am hoping that folks can come up with a set of logical criteria for inclusion to be usable later on as well, not just in this specific case. Please discuss, rather than edit war. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
"You're insulting a state" is hardly a logical argument. Meanwhile, please sign your comments. (Four tildes (~).) -- Nlu ( talk) 01:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The space at the top of this template needs to be removed. It is causing this template to look different than others on college coaches pages where multiple schools are included.
I'd suggest trying to come to a consensus with the folks at WikiProject College football to decide if interim coaches should be included. Until then, we'll leave the template protection in place. Caknuck ( talk) 00:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
For the sake of this discussion, I'm firing off an email to Nebraska's athletic department to see what, if any, opinion they have on this entire matter. Also, a direct link to the current interim coach discussion going on over at WP:CFB is here. – Swid ( talk · edits) 01:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL. IT IS SYSTEM GENERATED AND WILL NOT BE READ. PLEASE USE THE FEEDBACK LINK OR CUSTOMER SUPPORT TO RESPOND. In response to your request: I would like to know the position the Athletic Department has on the inclusion of interim head football coaches in official coaching records. Judging by this page ( http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=8&SPID=22&DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=4311), I presume that interim head coaches are only mentioned if they coached in a game. I realize this is a very minor matter, but as this page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:HuskersCoach) shows, there are some heated emotions and strong opinions about where Tom Osborne's four days as interim head coach should be officially recognized. The following response is provided: You are only included as an interim head coach in our records during an active season and if you coached a game. I doubt we will have any debate on that matter. Go Big Red! ------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you for your request. Ask the Athletic Dept.
That wraps things up quite nicely. Also, the edit protection can probably be lifted now. – Swid ( talk · edits) 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
This template appears on pages like 1972 Nebraska Cornhuskers football team, and since it includes the category Category:Nebraska Cornhuskers football coaches the category misleadingly appears on the page. Please can either the template be removed from pages like XXXX Nebraska Nornhuskers football team, or the category be removed from the template? I don't know what people think best. Dsp13 ( talk) 11:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Please discuss and give logical explanations as to why you think a certain coach should or should not be included. At the same time, I am hoping that folks can come up with a set of logical criteria for inclusion to be usable later on as well, not just in this specific case. Please discuss, rather than edit war. -- Nlu ( talk) 17:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
"You're insulting a state" is hardly a logical argument. Meanwhile, please sign your comments. (Four tildes (~).) -- Nlu ( talk) 01:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The space at the top of this template needs to be removed. It is causing this template to look different than others on college coaches pages where multiple schools are included.
I'd suggest trying to come to a consensus with the folks at WikiProject College football to decide if interim coaches should be included. Until then, we'll leave the template protection in place. Caknuck ( talk) 00:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
For the sake of this discussion, I'm firing off an email to Nebraska's athletic department to see what, if any, opinion they have on this entire matter. Also, a direct link to the current interim coach discussion going on over at WP:CFB is here. – Swid ( talk · edits) 01:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL. IT IS SYSTEM GENERATED AND WILL NOT BE READ. PLEASE USE THE FEEDBACK LINK OR CUSTOMER SUPPORT TO RESPOND. In response to your request: I would like to know the position the Athletic Department has on the inclusion of interim head football coaches in official coaching records. Judging by this page ( http://www.huskers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?SPSID=8&SPID=22&DB_OEM_ID=100&ATCLID=4311), I presume that interim head coaches are only mentioned if they coached in a game. I realize this is a very minor matter, but as this page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:HuskersCoach) shows, there are some heated emotions and strong opinions about where Tom Osborne's four days as interim head coach should be officially recognized. The following response is provided: You are only included as an interim head coach in our records during an active season and if you coached a game. I doubt we will have any debate on that matter. Go Big Red! ------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you for your request. Ask the Athletic Dept.
That wraps things up quite nicely. Also, the edit protection can probably be lifted now. – Swid ( talk · edits) 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
This template appears on pages like 1972 Nebraska Cornhuskers football team, and since it includes the category Category:Nebraska Cornhuskers football coaches the category misleadingly appears on the page. Please can either the template be removed from pages like XXXX Nebraska Nornhuskers football team, or the category be removed from the template? I don't know what people think best. Dsp13 ( talk) 11:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)