Is there a way a link to this article could be added to the bottom of the template? DavidRF ( talk) 00:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
One of these days, this template will have to be expanded to include all the "unnumbered" early works only known by their K. number (I'd avoid those greater-than-41 numbers that are often used, those are too confusing). Probably have to bite the bullet and split the template into sections and include both the K numbers and the ordinal numbers. DavidRF ( talk) 03:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
K. 16b, K. 19b, K. 66c, K. 66d, K. 66e, K. Anh.C. 11.07, K. Anh.C. 11.08, K. 383g. (All lost, but may have enough content for a valid article. The incipits are all known, I think.)
The spurious K. 311a might also deserve an article. Here's its incipit:
![\relative c'' {
\key bes \major
\tempo "Andante pastorale"
\time 6/8
f8. e16 f8 f8. g16 f8 | f4 d8(bes4 d8) | c4 c8 \grace{ c16[( d16]} es8.) d16 c8 | bes4 d8 f4 d8
}](https://upload.wikimedia.org/score/i/r/irxtkot0m1iizu1ok1wef7oquskx7or/irxtkot0.png)
Double sharp ( talk) 11:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, it looks like K. 383g is completely lost. Zaslaw does not mention it in his book, so I presume we've gained more knowledge about it...? Double sharp ( talk) 06:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Is there a way a link to this article could be added to the bottom of the template? DavidRF ( talk) 00:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
One of these days, this template will have to be expanded to include all the "unnumbered" early works only known by their K. number (I'd avoid those greater-than-41 numbers that are often used, those are too confusing). Probably have to bite the bullet and split the template into sections and include both the K numbers and the ordinal numbers. DavidRF ( talk) 03:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
K. 16b, K. 19b, K. 66c, K. 66d, K. 66e, K. Anh.C. 11.07, K. Anh.C. 11.08, K. 383g. (All lost, but may have enough content for a valid article. The incipits are all known, I think.)
The spurious K. 311a might also deserve an article. Here's its incipit:
Double sharp ( talk) 11:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, it looks like K. 383g is completely lost. Zaslaw does not mention it in his book, so I presume we've gained more knowledge about it...? Double sharp ( talk) 06:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)