This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles Numismatics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles Cryptocurrency This template is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles

This is definately a beautiful coin. However, we are trying to use a different photo than the one for {{ Coin-stub}}. It would be preferrable to use a note instead of a coin for this stub. -- JAYMEDINC 14:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Agree. The euro image was placed because there is a "freer" substitution. What we need is a very old, uncirculated, yet beautiful banknote image that is in public domain. -- ChoChoPK (球球PK) ( talk | contrib) 20:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Not trying to detract from the beauty of the coin, but I find it a little large. Resizing to 35px is much nicer in my opinion, even if the coin isn't quite so clear, but I'll wait for agreement ;). On the note of banknotes, something like File:1933-3-30-50.jpg perhaps? Jeodesic 23:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Year, the 5 kopek stub image may be too big. Even though I can tell right away what you suggest is a Reichsmark note at thumbnail size, I'm not sure if a casual reader can. But I don't feel strongly either way. -- ChoChoPK (球球PK) ( talk | contrib) 03:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply