This template is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Missing from timeline
The following are missing from the timeline:
Mercury Brougham, a Ford Motor Company automobile produced in 1967-68
Mercury Commuter, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Mercury Cyclone, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Mercury Eight, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Some of those are newer cars and don't pertain to this particular timeline, there's another for 1980-present vehicles. The My and Meta One were never produced, so they don't belong here. Generally we don't include separately-named wagon variants unless they're a long-running model (Country Squire, Colony Park, etc). The Grand Monarch Ghia is still a Monarch, and the Cyclone was a package on the Comet and Montego. --
Sable232 (
talk)
15:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I disagree about the Cyclone - you're right in that it started out as a Comet package, but it did become a separate model for a few years (1968-1970, I believe) before merging back into the Montego line (in a similar way to Pontiac's GTO moving from Tempest package to separate line to LeMans package). The Turnpike Cruiser, on the other hand, was only a separate model line for one year (and a trim option for one year after that), so giving it a whole entry is debatable at best.
Duncan1800 (
talk)
22:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Duplication of 1980s
Should 1980-1989 be kept in this timeline or taken out? It's in the modern part of the timeline, and 1980 seems to be the point of time where the timeline switches from historic to present-day in automotive timelines. It just seems like a point of duplication. --
SteveCof00 (
talk)
23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Missing from timeline
The following are missing from the timeline:
Mercury Brougham, a Ford Motor Company automobile produced in 1967-68
Mercury Commuter, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Mercury Cyclone, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Mercury Eight, an automobile from the Mercury division of the Ford Motor Company
Some of those are newer cars and don't pertain to this particular timeline, there's another for 1980-present vehicles. The My and Meta One were never produced, so they don't belong here. Generally we don't include separately-named wagon variants unless they're a long-running model (Country Squire, Colony Park, etc). The Grand Monarch Ghia is still a Monarch, and the Cyclone was a package on the Comet and Montego. --
Sable232 (
talk)
15:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I disagree about the Cyclone - you're right in that it started out as a Comet package, but it did become a separate model for a few years (1968-1970, I believe) before merging back into the Montego line (in a similar way to Pontiac's GTO moving from Tempest package to separate line to LeMans package). The Turnpike Cruiser, on the other hand, was only a separate model line for one year (and a trim option for one year after that), so giving it a whole entry is debatable at best.
Duncan1800 (
talk)
22:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Duplication of 1980s
Should 1980-1989 be kept in this timeline or taken out? It's in the modern part of the timeline, and 1980 seems to be the point of time where the timeline switches from historic to present-day in automotive timelines. It just seems like a point of duplication. --
SteveCof00 (
talk)
23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)reply