Canada Template‑class | |||||||
|
Someone center align the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.82.205 ( talk • contribs)
The security service is part of McMaster. No where does it say this is just an academic template. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 22:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Since you have not come to a consensus, I have requested a third opinion per the dispute resolution policy. Please stop reverting each other until consensus has been reached. You have both broken 3RR. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi all. I saw the listing for this on the third opinion page.
I'd like to summarise the dispute, if I may. Please correct me if I have read your position incorrectly.
Is that an accurate summary of the dispute? // roux 07:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
It looks to me as though the template isn't entirely academic--but it is entirely student-related. The campus security force, unless you can show that it's run and/or staffed by students, simply is not student-related. They are support staff, same as the janitors or cafeteria workers or librarians. The only way I could see it making sense for the security article to be included would be if:
Shorter version: no, the police don't really belong. And the request for comment is complete overkill.
// roux 17:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Canada Template‑class | |||||||
|
Someone center align the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.82.205 ( talk • contribs)
The security service is part of McMaster. No where does it say this is just an academic template. Me-123567-Me ( talk) 22:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Since you have not come to a consensus, I have requested a third opinion per the dispute resolution policy. Please stop reverting each other until consensus has been reached. You have both broken 3RR. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi all. I saw the listing for this on the third opinion page.
I'd like to summarise the dispute, if I may. Please correct me if I have read your position incorrectly.
Is that an accurate summary of the dispute? // roux 07:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
It looks to me as though the template isn't entirely academic--but it is entirely student-related. The campus security force, unless you can show that it's run and/or staffed by students, simply is not student-related. They are support staff, same as the janitors or cafeteria workers or librarians. The only way I could see it making sense for the security article to be included would be if:
Shorter version: no, the police don't really belong. And the request for comment is complete overkill.
// roux 17:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)