This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Template:Very long Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Template talk:Very long |
This template was considered for deletion on 2006 December 19. The result of the discussion was "to keep". |
RyanG e rbil10 (Упражнение В!) 08:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
This template is being used on articles that are not 200 KB long. Either it should be changed to a lower number, or multiple versions should be made. Ardric47 02:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
This template should be placed at the top of talk pages, not at the top of articles. There is no reason to bombard every casual reader with such a message. For almost any article with such a length, there will be an active talk page. A split would have to be discussed there anyway. So, the template can usefully go there informing normal editors without clubbing everyone else who just wants some info. And before you go there, splitting pages up is not a good first-time exercise for a new editor. So, we do not want to attract ordinary readers to become editors this way. Derex 10:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Article size, browser limitations are no longer a serious problem, and the size guidelines are mostly for readers' convenience. I propose removing the second sentence from the template. CMummert · talk 03:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
An anon changed the wording of the template around a month ago without discussing it. I re-inserted it. Quadzilla99 02:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Template:Very long Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Template talk:Very long |
This template was considered for deletion on 2006 December 19. The result of the discussion was "to keep". |
RyanG e rbil10 (Упражнение В!) 08:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
This template is being used on articles that are not 200 KB long. Either it should be changed to a lower number, or multiple versions should be made. Ardric47 02:41, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
This template should be placed at the top of talk pages, not at the top of articles. There is no reason to bombard every casual reader with such a message. For almost any article with such a length, there will be an active talk page. A split would have to be discussed there anyway. So, the template can usefully go there informing normal editors without clubbing everyone else who just wants some info. And before you go there, splitting pages up is not a good first-time exercise for a new editor. So, we do not want to attract ordinary readers to become editors this way. Derex 10:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Article size, browser limitations are no longer a serious problem, and the size guidelines are mostly for readers' convenience. I propose removing the second sentence from the template. CMummert · talk 03:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
An anon changed the wording of the template around a month ago without discussing it. I re-inserted it. Quadzilla99 02:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)