IznoRepeat, I can't understand your reasoning behind the removal of the link to Sackboy's Prehistoric Moves. Could you explain which part of WP:NAV your are referring to please? - X201 ( talk) 08:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Except it's not a "cosmetic" gain. It's a fundamental difference in navigation which enables editors to keep a tidier house and readers to get to the articles they need to get to.
"The overwhelming answer is yes" needs a reason. I completely disagree, and I think NAV is persuasive on the count. You haven't yet given a reason this game is anymore important than Tiberian Sun: Firestorm, any more important than any of the number of Red Alert expansions, or any more important than any other expansions or games which don't have their own articles.
Part of the reason I'm so adamant about it is because of IPs or new users, or even experienced users, who innocently make a redirect into an anchor link and in the process choose not to consider whether that contributes significantly to navigation, as was done here. It's easier from a maintenance standpoint if the only links included are individual articles, and it represents a concrete point for navigation makers to say "this is useful". And with that concrete point, it's easy to say "there is no slippery slope, and my edits are consistent". Consider any of the above examples as a point here. -- Izno ( talk) 23:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
There's a template for redirects of this nature at Template:R with possibilities, in case you weren't aware, and the redirect should also be tagged with Template:R to section.
Beyond that, I'm not sure I can provide an answer to the question of "get someone [new] to work on it" beyond setting up an article which can survive WP:N as a stub and letting the various and sundry others work on it from there, or pointing out via something like {{ expand section}} at the top of the section that we want work done on that particular topic, or lastly, doing all of the work yourself. -- Izno ( talk) 21:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
I added the DLC icon for LittleBigPlanet 3, it need contents of LBP3 DLC such as Rare Launch T-Shirt, Metal Gear Solid, and uhh... Dragon Age. 2601:4:2C82:191:D8F8:EFC3:9414:4E36 ( talk) 03:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
IznoRepeat, I can't understand your reasoning behind the removal of the link to Sackboy's Prehistoric Moves. Could you explain which part of WP:NAV your are referring to please? - X201 ( talk) 08:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Except it's not a "cosmetic" gain. It's a fundamental difference in navigation which enables editors to keep a tidier house and readers to get to the articles they need to get to.
"The overwhelming answer is yes" needs a reason. I completely disagree, and I think NAV is persuasive on the count. You haven't yet given a reason this game is anymore important than Tiberian Sun: Firestorm, any more important than any of the number of Red Alert expansions, or any more important than any other expansions or games which don't have their own articles.
Part of the reason I'm so adamant about it is because of IPs or new users, or even experienced users, who innocently make a redirect into an anchor link and in the process choose not to consider whether that contributes significantly to navigation, as was done here. It's easier from a maintenance standpoint if the only links included are individual articles, and it represents a concrete point for navigation makers to say "this is useful". And with that concrete point, it's easy to say "there is no slippery slope, and my edits are consistent". Consider any of the above examples as a point here. -- Izno ( talk) 23:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
There's a template for redirects of this nature at Template:R with possibilities, in case you weren't aware, and the redirect should also be tagged with Template:R to section.
Beyond that, I'm not sure I can provide an answer to the question of "get someone [new] to work on it" beyond setting up an article which can survive WP:N as a stub and letting the various and sundry others work on it from there, or pointing out via something like {{ expand section}} at the top of the section that we want work done on that particular topic, or lastly, doing all of the work yourself. -- Izno ( talk) 21:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
I added the DLC icon for LittleBigPlanet 3, it need contents of LBP3 DLC such as Rare Launch T-Shirt, Metal Gear Solid, and uhh... Dragon Age. 2601:4:2C82:191:D8F8:EFC3:9414:4E36 ( talk) 03:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)