Linux Template‑class | |||||||
|
As for RPM being both a sources and binaries format, we should replace with,
RPM sources | Unknown |
Source-based (non-RPM) | GoboLinux, NixOS, Gentoo, Source Mage |
RPM binaries | dnf, yum zypp, apt-rpm, urpmi, up2date |
instead of,
.rpm | dnf, zypp, apt-rpm, urpmi, up2date |
Others (source-based) | GoboLinux, NixOS, Gentoo, Source Mage |
101.78.166.156 ( talk) 06:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
User:NuclearWizard It's WP:BRD not BRRD. You're meant to Discuss here before redoing your edit. As for the merit, yes, per my old comment on the web browser template, italics are used on other templates, but at least one of those in your edit is wrong - per my comment [1] which is not addressed in your revert. "It's used on other software templates, including the web browser template. Please bring your proposal to remove them to the talk page, since we do need a way to distinguish discontinued software from actively developed software." [2] [3]. Of course, the obvious differences are size and obsolescence - old browsers are not secure and quickly use utility, but old PMs not. There is no grounding in the MOS italics for this, so please justify here. Widefox; talk 21:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Linux Template‑class | |||||||
|
As for RPM being both a sources and binaries format, we should replace with,
RPM sources | Unknown |
Source-based (non-RPM) | GoboLinux, NixOS, Gentoo, Source Mage |
RPM binaries | dnf, yum zypp, apt-rpm, urpmi, up2date |
instead of,
.rpm | dnf, zypp, apt-rpm, urpmi, up2date |
Others (source-based) | GoboLinux, NixOS, Gentoo, Source Mage |
101.78.166.156 ( talk) 06:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
User:NuclearWizard It's WP:BRD not BRRD. You're meant to Discuss here before redoing your edit. As for the merit, yes, per my old comment on the web browser template, italics are used on other templates, but at least one of those in your edit is wrong - per my comment [1] which is not addressed in your revert. "It's used on other software templates, including the web browser template. Please bring your proposal to remove them to the talk page, since we do need a way to distinguish discontinued software from actively developed software." [2] [3]. Of course, the obvious differences are size and obsolescence - old browsers are not secure and quickly use utility, but old PMs not. There is no grounding in the MOS italics for this, so please justify here. Widefox; talk 21:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)