Kylie Minogue is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue articles
I did remove some (not all) of the content, but that is what I think helps the template become less bulky and overwhelming, and I do not consider this "silly", as this is the consensus that was reached over a similar template in use on the single and album articles for
Mariah Carey. A link to Minogue's discography article is still present, so I'm afraid I don't see what the problem is. As I have previously requested on your talk page, please do not use the administrators' rollback feature to revert good faith edits, as this is a violation of the
Wikipedia:Revert guidelines. Thanks.
Extraordinary Machine18:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)reply
Kylie Minogue is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue articles
I did remove some (not all) of the content, but that is what I think helps the template become less bulky and overwhelming, and I do not consider this "silly", as this is the consensus that was reached over a similar template in use on the single and album articles for
Mariah Carey. A link to Minogue's discography article is still present, so I'm afraid I don't see what the problem is. As I have previously requested on your talk page, please do not use the administrators' rollback feature to revert good faith edits, as this is a violation of the
Wikipedia:Revert guidelines. Thanks.
Extraordinary Machine18:55, 5 December 2005 (UTC)reply