This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ladakh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ladakh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LadakhWikipedia:WikiProject LadakhTemplate:WikiProject LadakhLadakh articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
"Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered
The "Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered. Compare the following two templates. Note in the template "India–Pakistan relations" - "Simla Agreement" is listed under "Treaties and Summits". Should others also be included in this template such as Tashkent Declaration and Agra summit.
Abhishek0831996, care to explain why you're POV-pushing and labelling peaceful organizations such as
Tehreek-e-Hurriyat as "terrorist jihadist" groups, when TeH hasn't even been classified as such by any government or organization in the world? (Read:
WP:OR). Furthermore, while
Dukhtaran-e-Millat has been banned by India for separatism, as a peaceful all-women organisation which has never engaged in militancy or been designated as a terrorist group by any other country, does it seriously count as "terrorist jihadist" group in the league of
ISIS-K? Then there's the non-jihadi militants like
JKLF (again, not even banned by the Indian government[1]). If you insist on lumping all of them under the same label, then "Separatist/Militant" conforms to
WP:NPOV.
Cipher21(talk)18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ladakh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ladakh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LadakhWikipedia:WikiProject LadakhTemplate:WikiProject LadakhLadakh articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
"Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered
The "Negotiations" section of template needs to be considered. Compare the following two templates. Note in the template "India–Pakistan relations" - "Simla Agreement" is listed under "Treaties and Summits". Should others also be included in this template such as Tashkent Declaration and Agra summit.
Abhishek0831996, care to explain why you're POV-pushing and labelling peaceful organizations such as
Tehreek-e-Hurriyat as "terrorist jihadist" groups, when TeH hasn't even been classified as such by any government or organization in the world? (Read:
WP:OR). Furthermore, while
Dukhtaran-e-Millat has been banned by India for separatism, as a peaceful all-women organisation which has never engaged in militancy or been designated as a terrorist group by any other country, does it seriously count as "terrorist jihadist" group in the league of
ISIS-K? Then there's the non-jihadi militants like
JKLF (again, not even banned by the Indian government[1]). If you insist on lumping all of them under the same label, then "Separatist/Militant" conforms to
WP:NPOV.
Cipher21(talk)18:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)reply