This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Split
Let's revisit the attempted split of this navbox by
Yallayallaletsgo. The scope of this navbox is arbitrary and unclear, as it contains members that are not common to both Judaism and Christianity. I suggest a split into:
Not seeing any dissent to this proposal so I will move forward with it in a few days or weeks.
Ibadibam (
talk) 23:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Ibadibam, I came to this talk page to suggest exactly this – any plans to make the split? ezlev (
user/
tlk/
ctrbs) 20:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ezlev: If you'd like to take it on, please feel free! Otherwise I'll get to it eventually.
Ibadibam (
talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
See
this TFD discussion. There are already two templates that exist, so if the decision is to split, those templates should be moved to the new names in order to preserve their history. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Those templates were only just created by the nominator of that TfD (without, I note, any participation here), and I already recommended the move there.
Ibadibam (
talk) 22:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
So although in this discussion there was a weak local consensus to split, we now have a no-consensus close on the
TfD (wish
Ploni had checked here first before all that!). So what's the way forward now?
Ibadibam (
talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Split
Let's revisit the attempted split of this navbox by
Yallayallaletsgo. The scope of this navbox is arbitrary and unclear, as it contains members that are not common to both Judaism and Christianity. I suggest a split into:
Not seeing any dissent to this proposal so I will move forward with it in a few days or weeks.
Ibadibam (
talk) 23:34, 9 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Ibadibam, I came to this talk page to suggest exactly this – any plans to make the split? ezlev (
user/
tlk/
ctrbs) 20:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Ezlev: If you'd like to take it on, please feel free! Otherwise I'll get to it eventually.
Ibadibam (
talk) 22:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)reply
See
this TFD discussion. There are already two templates that exist, so if the decision is to split, those templates should be moved to the new names in order to preserve their history. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Those templates were only just created by the nominator of that TfD (without, I note, any participation here), and I already recommended the move there.
Ibadibam (
talk) 22:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)reply
So although in this discussion there was a weak local consensus to split, we now have a no-consensus close on the
TfD (wish
Ploni had checked here first before all that!). So what's the way forward now?
Ibadibam (
talk) 05:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)reply