This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Antisemitism controversy in the template
Nobody denies that it has received coverage; however, the standard necessary to put something potentially-negative in a template, under
WP:BLP, is extremely high (since a template allows no room for context). And the
WP:DUE weight has to be weighed against what is already in the template. In this case, it's absurd to suggest that this scandal (which, going by the sources in that page, has largely - though not exclusively - played itself out in op-eds and tabloids) is the most notable thing about Corbyn's leadership; this doesn't reflect the weight on his page, even before accounting for the fact that the relevant section has been tagged as undue itself for several months. Making it the headline item about his leadership - and indeed the only item listed, aside from formulaic things about his campaign and cabinet - is giving it more weight than the sourcing that has been presented so far can justify. Beyond that, the page itself is not obviously and directly about Corbyn - while he figures prominently, its primary subject is Labour, not Corbyn. --
Aquillion (
talk)
23:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Antisemitism controversy in the template
Nobody denies that it has received coverage; however, the standard necessary to put something potentially-negative in a template, under
WP:BLP, is extremely high (since a template allows no room for context). And the
WP:DUE weight has to be weighed against what is already in the template. In this case, it's absurd to suggest that this scandal (which, going by the sources in that page, has largely - though not exclusively - played itself out in op-eds and tabloids) is the most notable thing about Corbyn's leadership; this doesn't reflect the weight on his page, even before accounting for the fact that the relevant section has been tagged as undue itself for several months. Making it the headline item about his leadership - and indeed the only item listed, aside from formulaic things about his campaign and cabinet - is giving it more weight than the sourcing that has been presented so far can justify. Beyond that, the page itself is not obviously and directly about Corbyn - while he figures prominently, its primary subject is Labour, not Corbyn. --
Aquillion (
talk)
23:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)reply
.svg){kind=small}
