![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
The description for this template says, "This is a template for generating an entry in a junction list or exit list when there is a gap in the route". So why is it not being used exclusively for route gaps? I want to use this "cross-hatching" background that I associate with temporary conditions. You might not want to see it, but I do, which is why I've tweaked my personal CSS to that effect. -- Denelson 83 10:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I've restored this template back to the status quo ante. The first change involved switching from raw HTML to wikicode table formatting, but used the ! That generates a table header. That breaches MOS:DTT, so it was reverted. The second change restored wikicoding, but that didn't actually do anything. The third change places a background color, which breaches MOS:RJL. Colors normally need to be approved before hand, but in this case, it duplicated one of the existing colors for a totally different meaning.
In any case, this template should be at the same level of protection as the other junction list templates because it's all one interconnected series. That means consensus to make changes ahead of time. That would preclude good faith edits that cause MOS issues. Imzadi 1979 → 06:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This doesn't seem to work, despite there being code to handle it:
County | Location | mi | km | Destinations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
huge 200-mile overlap; see I-25 | |||||||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
-- NE2 22:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
The description for this template says, "This is a template for generating an entry in a junction list or exit list when there is a gap in the route". So why is it not being used exclusively for route gaps? I want to use this "cross-hatching" background that I associate with temporary conditions. You might not want to see it, but I do, which is why I've tweaked my personal CSS to that effect. -- Denelson 83 10:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I've restored this template back to the status quo ante. The first change involved switching from raw HTML to wikicode table formatting, but used the ! That generates a table header. That breaches MOS:DTT, so it was reverted. The second change restored wikicoding, but that didn't actually do anything. The third change places a background color, which breaches MOS:RJL. Colors normally need to be approved before hand, but in this case, it duplicated one of the existing colors for a totally different meaning.
In any case, this template should be at the same level of protection as the other junction list templates because it's all one interconnected series. That means consensus to make changes ahead of time. That would preclude good faith edits that cause MOS issues. Imzadi 1979 → 06:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
This doesn't seem to work, despite there being code to handle it:
County | Location | mi | km | Destinations | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
huge 200-mile overlap; see I-25 | |||||||
1.000 mi = 1.609 km; 1.000 km = 0.621 mi |
-- NE2 22:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)