This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads This template is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles This article may or may not have a map. Please check, then add |needs-map= to this template accordingly. This article may or may not contain a junction list. Please check, then add |needs-jctint= to this template accordingly.

Is it possible to globalize this template to allow for use in Canada, right now links is hard coded to /USA. Can we add a country field, but if none is specified to default to USA so that existing uses aren't messed up? Also, if we do globalize it, the {{ USRD}} tag should be changed to {{ HWY}} and the template renamed remove the state out of it, and just leave it Infobox highway system. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 01:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Since I rewrote it, I can work on this. although we could make a duplicate called {{ infobox provincial highway system}} and drop out the I/US stuff and code it a little differently to provide more custom labels. Imzadi  1979  → 02:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply

That works. I used what I can using the current infobox on List of New Brunswick provincial highways. I would update the documentation to mention the new infobox for non-US highways, and then tag the new on with HWY, and make sure that its linked to from CRWP and HWY. -- Admrboltz ( talk) 02:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Is there a way to get the infobox to handle links for multiple systems? For instance, List of turnpikes in Virginia and West Virginia should have system links for both VA and WV. Dough 4872 01:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC) reply