This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Infobox graphics processing unit template. |
|
Why is there:
?
I have the feeling these are two variables for the same thing...
Wikiinger (
talk)
21:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I notice there are only entry through enthusiast product categories. I am thinking to add "Workstation" and "Data Center" (or maybe "Compute") product categories. This would help as there has cards like the Tesla/Radeon Instinct lines which do not fall into the current categories but are definitely GPU products. Thoughts ( Wikiinger, Od1n, or ScotXW)? Dbsseven ( talk) 23:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I think that the "architecture" field should be repurposed as a subheading for the first section of the main infobox - that section currently doesn't have a subheading (but the sections below it all do), all of the fields within it describe the chip architecture, and (even though there is a separate "cards" section below) it looks strange to have an image of a representative card directly above e.g. "manufacturer: TSMC" - TSMC didn't make that fan. Or those capacitors. Just the chip on the inside! One cookie ( talk) 19:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Infobox graphics processing unit template. |
|
Why is there:
?
I have the feeling these are two variables for the same thing...
Wikiinger (
talk)
21:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
I notice there are only entry through enthusiast product categories. I am thinking to add "Workstation" and "Data Center" (or maybe "Compute") product categories. This would help as there has cards like the Tesla/Radeon Instinct lines which do not fall into the current categories but are definitely GPU products. Thoughts ( Wikiinger, Od1n, or ScotXW)? Dbsseven ( talk) 23:06, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I think that the "architecture" field should be repurposed as a subheading for the first section of the main infobox - that section currently doesn't have a subheading (but the sections below it all do), all of the fields within it describe the chip architecture, and (even though there is a separate "cards" section below) it looks strange to have an image of a representative card directly above e.g. "manufacturer: TSMC" - TSMC didn't make that fan. Or those capacitors. Just the chip on the inside! One cookie ( talk) 19:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)