This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User:Nikos 1993/sandbox/Drugbox — changes:
Nikos 1993 ( talk) 01:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
<sup><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/h_chemlist_listorder.pdf <nowiki>[check]</nowiki>]</span></sup>
foobar
[check]
Nikos 1993 (
talk)
20:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Is anyone going to deploy these changes? Everyone only complains like it was some revolution which needs long discussions, while it is simply extending existing solution to UN and EU regulations! (And I have experience with MediaWiki syntax, so I'm sure I didn't break existing code). Nikos 1993 ( talk) 23:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note There have been no further comments so I plan to implement this shortly. Nikos, can you confirm that the latest (23 June) version in the sandbox is ready to deploy? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 18:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
When I clink the SMILES in Pingyangmycin, the drugbox is expanded to the width of the whole screen. Anyone can fix that? THX!-- Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 22:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
style="max-width: 25%"
has been tried? --
ἀνυπόδητος (
talk)
07:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I've solved this in the chembox on Chinese wikipedia (the template is not fully protected there). Just need to add "max-width:22em; word-wrap: break-word". However, idk how to deal with it in drugbox.-- Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It works by adding | liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
as the first parameter (although this shouldn't be relevant) to the two {{
Collapsible list}}s (lines 506 and 509 for SMILES and InChI, respectively), which I hereby request. Working example see
User:Anypodetos/Sandbox2, where the template
User:Anypodetos/Sandbox is transcluded. The mentioned param is included for SMILES but not for InChI. Thanks --
ἀνυπόδητος (
talk)
18:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Again, it's about the SMILES problem above. Using | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
instead of | liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
would makes it looks better when the image is wider than the original drugbox size, see
the sandbox version and
the current version.
Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 12:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
| liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
, when the drugbox is wider than the original drugbox size, the smiles and inchi section would still have the fixed width of the original drugbox size. Using | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
would solve this problem. However the chembox should not be changed since | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
would might break down the words in the IUPAC name.--
Jsjsjs1111 (
talk)
14:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
The params licence_EU and licence_US don't seem to work – the external links they produce end up on the EMA/FDA search pages. Any idea how to fix this? -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 17:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I recently started a discussion at WP:PHARM around a proposal to expand the information in this template and to maintain this information using a bot. The discussion began here, and has since moved over to User:ProteinBoxBot/Phase_3. I'd personally like to focus on adding new fields for data that is not already in the drugbox, but we're happy to take on the role of maintaining existing parameters as well. In any case, feedback is welcome... Cheers, Andrew Su ( talk) 05:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
This template needs a parameter for equianalgesia relative to morphine. — C M B J 06:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There is no option for flash or decomposition points in the physical data field. This seems like a fairly big oversight for several drugs that are vaporized as a method of administration. 3AlarmLampscooter ( talk) 02:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Currently in the drugbox there is no information as to standard dosage ranges and frequency of dosing and I believe to add such a field would be helpful. Fuse809 ( talk) 14:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Moved. The arguments in favor of uniformity counter the non-issue of the old name continuing to be used as a redirect. Given the way that templates work, there is no substantive difference between having one title or the other, and the arguments for uniformity in template naming support the name flip. bd2412 T 14:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Drugbox → Template:Infobox drug – This template is already an infobox, as is shown by its categorisation under Medicine infobox templates, and the title should also reflect this. There are thousands of infoboxes, and using a consistent naming scheme helps with maintenance and administrative tasks. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 15:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
When multiple legality fields are used (e.g. legal_US and legal_UK), their contents run together. Instead, they should be separated by a line break, so that the distinction between localities is made clear. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 17:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to fix this long-standing annoyance.
The bullet and flatlist styles are useful when you can actually get more than one item on a line within the width of the infobox. In the case of the legal status, though, that mostly isn't possible, and the current run-together style is just confusing. The current hydrocodone article looks like:
Legal status | Controlled (S8) ( AU) | |
Schedule I ( CA) Class A | ||
(CD) ( UK) Schedule II (US) |
Try to quickly determine the exact UK classification (Class A (CD)).
I'd like it to look like:
Legal status | Controlled (S8) ( AU) | |
Schedule I ( CA) | ||
Class A (CD) ( UK) | ||
Schedule II ( US) |
or, since one normally thinks about looking for the status for a given country, placing the key to the left of the value:
Legal status | AU: Controlled (S8) | |
CA: Schedule I | ||
UK: Class A (CD) | ||
US: Schedule II |
An added benefit, per the current MOS, is that (invisible) list markup will be used, which is the more correct technical way to do it.
Thoughts? —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 09:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
{{
ubl}}
template is available for this:Legal status |
| |
Legal status |
|
{{
ubl}}
in action at
LB&SCR A1X Class W8 Freshwater. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Any objections if I add Al, Ca, Li, and Mg to the Formula field? Per Category:Drug pages needing formula fontification, there are a couple of pages each that would need these. -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 20:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
In the article
Etorphine, the {{
Drugbox}} is displayed much too wide; this messes up the whole page. By trial and error I have tracked the problem to the parameter |StdInChI=
. Unfortunately, I do not understand what this is (I am not a chemist), so have no idea what would be the proper way to break this up. Hopefully, somebody else knows.
HairyWombat
04:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, people. I feel the need to request new bits of chemical information to be added to the drugbox, namely the following:
I would also think adding some dosing information would be nice but I understand (but don't necessarily agree) that this is to avoid the use of Wikipedia as a source of personal medical advice. Fuse809 ( talk) 10:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Blood-brain penetrability data isn't always available (and in my experience is rather rare) and hence there is still value to log P. Fuse809 ( talk) 01:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes if it has effects in the CNS it must cross the BBB but the extent is where log P comes in. Amisulpride, for instance, the antipsychotic isn't very lipophilic (low log P) and hence while it has CNS effects it has significantly more prominent peripheral effects such as hyperprolactinaemia. True polar surface area is a better predictor and hence I'd be glad to substitute it for log P if you so desire. As for its plasma binding well that's what the protein binding part of pharmacokinetic data is for. Fuse809 ( talk) 10:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Log P/PSA is good to have just because usually its a good predictor of CNS penetrability and activity. Yes there are other variables that can affect it such as protein binding to myelin but usually log P/PSA is a decent predictor. If CNS effects are observed it does penetrate the BBB but as I gave with the example of amisulpride the extent is relevant. If you go through all the CNS-affecting drugs in clinical practice blood-brain penetrability is very well predicted by log P/PSA. For instance fentanyl has a much higher log P (~3.89 vs. ~0.5) and lower PSA (23.55 Â2 vs. 52.93 Â2) than morphine and consequently it is far (x100) more potent an analgesic than morphine and produces fewer peripheral adverse effects (e.g. constipation, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, etc.). I will acknowledge that it isn't a perfect predictor but neither is any bit of clinical data seeing how there are individual differences. Fuse809 ( talk) 13:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
If you have experimental data on the penetrability of every clinically-utilised drug across the BBB then you must have an unprecedentedly extensive resource and in such a case I consider it selfish that you're not sharing it with wikipedia by encorporating it into our articles. P-glycoprotein mustn't do this to morphine that efficiently as it still has central effects but nonetheless other morphine-like opioids such as oxycodone are significantly less lipophilic than fentanyl and hence are significantly weaker and have more prominent peripheral side effects such as emesis, constipation and pruritus. Plus ionic molecules like methylnaltrexone have poor BBB penetrability and has a significantly lower log P than its non-ionic counterpart, naltrexone. Fuse809 ( talk) 04:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Is it possible to have this as a removeable value? There are many novel drugs for which there is no pregnancy category, and having a ? in these cases serves only to unncessarily extend the drugbox. The substances in question often have little information known so the articles are short and huge drugboxes become especially unecessary. Testem ( talk) 23:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone support adding an LD50 field? Exercisephys ( talk) 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request that the drugbox, in analogy to the chembox which can currently manage this, becomes capable of showing the structure of the two enantiomers of a drug, side-by-side. Fuse809 ( talk) 12:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Well tramadol is the drug I'd currently like to be able to do this with; the example I have of how the chembox can do this (albeit the two images side-by-side the way I want it aren't different enantiomers, just different 3D representations of the molecule) is on this page, 2C-P. Fuse809 ( talk) 17:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Here are the two codes: R-tramadol and S-tramadol. Fuse809 ( talk) 04:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I've updated the ChemSpider ID as follows, from:
| label46 = [[ChemSpider]] | data46 = {{#ifeq:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}}|NA||{{#if:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}} | <span class="reflink plainlinks nourlexpansion">[http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.{{{ChemSpiderID}}} {{{ChemSpiderID}}}]</span>{{{ChemSpiderID_Ref|}}} }}}}
to
| label46 = [[ChemSpider]] | data46 = {{#ifeq:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}}|NA||{{#if:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}} | <span class="reflink plainlinks nourlexpansion">[http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.{{{ChemSpiderID}}}.html {{{ChemSpiderID}}}]</span>{{{ChemSpiderID_Ref|}}} }}}}
This was in response to a request from the ChemSpider folks. The Drugbox was directing people to the disfavored link. -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 13:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, people, I've already requested left and right 3D image fields so as to account for the possible isomerism of drug molecules and now I'm requesting some additional fields to account for isomerism. Namely, I think ChemSpider ID, PubChem, SMILES, StdInChIKey and StdInChI should have an additional field one can provide it with so that it takes into account the isomerism of drug molecules. For instance, tramadol has two isomers (+) and (-) which have ChemSpider IDs of 31105 and 580887, respectively. Fuse809 ( talk) 01:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
I have prepared some changes, in {{ Infobox drug/sandbox}}. See also {{ infobox drug/testcases}}.
|melting_high=
, will show using "... to ..." not a (more confusing) "–". Bad numerical input will be in the {{convert}} errorcategory.|SMILES=
as input for being the name (next to lowercase |smiles=
).I expect it can be put live shortly. - DePiep ( talk) 23:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
In {{ Infobox drug/doc}} I have listed the categories that are mentioned (filled) in the infobox. Some are redlinks. I guess the categorizing logic needs a review. - DePiep ( talk) 12:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed the drugbox has no legal categorisation for NZ and I'd like to request this change. Fuse809 ( talk) 11:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
The Co-codamol legal_UK field correctly includes both types: POM/P but no link(s) are generated. I manually linked as POM/ P. Widefox; talk 01:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov website supports HTTPS, I suggest switching the link to protocol-relative URL ( reason). Here is the change. Thanks! Chmarkine ( talk) 19:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Anyone know of a way to download all the drugboxes out there for analysis? I'm a researcher interested in analyzing this data. Dalek2point3 ( talk) 20:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I can't work out why the image on rivaroxaban is not displaying properly! JFW | T@lk 20:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Two things spawned from some comments at Talk:Tetracycline#Cartoon moved here and structure swapped. First, is there any standard for or against including animated 3D diagrams? Given the strong positions of the editor making them and others, I'd like to see some consensus (or at least note of the lack thereof) centralized. Second, what are editors' feelings regarding including an external link to a Jmol model, such as happens automatically (based on the SMILES field) in {{ chembox}}? DMacks ( talk) 00:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
~~ Copy-pasting someone else's viewpoint (from WT:MEDMOS) that I think is a revelation in this case as it made me change my mind! ~~ Brenton ( contribs · email · talk · uploads) 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Please add ONSET field to Pharmacokinetics. Please make it easy and obvious for non-experts to add such appropriate fields one-time ad hoc. (These templates feel very rigid and unfriendly to unexpert editors, quite un-WPish.) - 71.174.175.228 ( talk) 14:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I noticed recently a number of pages appeared in Category:Drug_pages_needing_a_structure_drawing even though they contain images. It appears related to a switch from using the "image = " field to using "imageL =" and "imageR = ". See for example, this edit. Anyone know how to fix this? -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
-->{{main other|{{#if:{{{image|}}}{{{image2|}}}
-->{{main other|{{#if:{{{image|}}}{{{image2|}}}{{{imageL|}}}{{{imageR|}}}
This
edit request to
Template:Infobox drug has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
They moved the root from
Just substitute that line and it will work correctly. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 02:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
{{ Chembox}} already has permissible exposure limit aka PEL (a US legal limit). There is a proposal to add recommended exposure limit aka REL (US, non-legal). Any thoughts on adding both to this Drugbox? See current talk at WT:Chembox, REL. - DePiep ( talk) 09:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
User:Nikos 1993/sandbox/Drugbox — changes:
Nikos 1993 ( talk) 01:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
<sup><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/orangebook/h_chemlist_listorder.pdf <nowiki>[check]</nowiki>]</span></sup>
foobar
[check]
Nikos 1993 (
talk)
20:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Is anyone going to deploy these changes? Everyone only complains like it was some revolution which needs long discussions, while it is simply extending existing solution to UN and EU regulations! (And I have experience with MediaWiki syntax, so I'm sure I didn't break existing code). Nikos 1993 ( talk) 23:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note There have been no further comments so I plan to implement this shortly. Nikos, can you confirm that the latest (23 June) version in the sandbox is ready to deploy? — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 18:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
When I clink the SMILES in Pingyangmycin, the drugbox is expanded to the width of the whole screen. Anyone can fix that? THX!-- Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 22:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
style="max-width: 25%"
has been tried? --
ἀνυπόδητος (
talk)
07:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I've solved this in the chembox on Chinese wikipedia (the template is not fully protected there). Just need to add "max-width:22em; word-wrap: break-word". However, idk how to deal with it in drugbox.-- Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 14:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It works by adding | liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
as the first parameter (although this shouldn't be relevant) to the two {{
Collapsible list}}s (lines 506 and 509 for SMILES and InChI, respectively), which I hereby request. Working example see
User:Anypodetos/Sandbox2, where the template
User:Anypodetos/Sandbox is transcluded. The mentioned param is included for SMILES but not for InChI. Thanks --
ἀνυπόδητος (
talk)
18:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Again, it's about the SMILES problem above. Using | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
instead of | liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
would makes it looks better when the image is wider than the original drugbox size, see
the sandbox version and
the current version.
Jsjsjs1111 ( talk) 12:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
| liststyle = max-width:22em; word-wrap:break-word;
, when the drugbox is wider than the original drugbox size, the smiles and inchi section would still have the fixed width of the original drugbox size. Using | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
would solve this problem. However the chembox should not be changed since | liststyle = word-break:break-all;
would might break down the words in the IUPAC name.--
Jsjsjs1111 (
talk)
14:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
The params licence_EU and licence_US don't seem to work – the external links they produce end up on the EMA/FDA search pages. Any idea how to fix this? -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 17:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I recently started a discussion at WP:PHARM around a proposal to expand the information in this template and to maintain this information using a bot. The discussion began here, and has since moved over to User:ProteinBoxBot/Phase_3. I'd personally like to focus on adding new fields for data that is not already in the drugbox, but we're happy to take on the role of maintaining existing parameters as well. In any case, feedback is welcome... Cheers, Andrew Su ( talk) 05:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
This template needs a parameter for equianalgesia relative to morphine. — C M B J 06:04, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There is no option for flash or decomposition points in the physical data field. This seems like a fairly big oversight for several drugs that are vaporized as a method of administration. 3AlarmLampscooter ( talk) 02:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Currently in the drugbox there is no information as to standard dosage ranges and frequency of dosing and I believe to add such a field would be helpful. Fuse809 ( talk) 14:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Moved. The arguments in favor of uniformity counter the non-issue of the old name continuing to be used as a redirect. Given the way that templates work, there is no substantive difference between having one title or the other, and the arguments for uniformity in template naming support the name flip. bd2412 T 14:10, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Drugbox → Template:Infobox drug – This template is already an infobox, as is shown by its categorisation under Medicine infobox templates, and the title should also reflect this. There are thousands of infoboxes, and using a consistent naming scheme helps with maintenance and administrative tasks. eh bien mon prince ( talk) 15:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
When multiple legality fields are used (e.g. legal_US and legal_UK), their contents run together. Instead, they should be separated by a line break, so that the distinction between localities is made clear. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 17:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to fix this long-standing annoyance.
The bullet and flatlist styles are useful when you can actually get more than one item on a line within the width of the infobox. In the case of the legal status, though, that mostly isn't possible, and the current run-together style is just confusing. The current hydrocodone article looks like:
Legal status | Controlled (S8) ( AU) | |
Schedule I ( CA) Class A | ||
(CD) ( UK) Schedule II (US) |
Try to quickly determine the exact UK classification (Class A (CD)).
I'd like it to look like:
Legal status | Controlled (S8) ( AU) | |
Schedule I ( CA) | ||
Class A (CD) ( UK) | ||
Schedule II ( US) |
or, since one normally thinks about looking for the status for a given country, placing the key to the left of the value:
Legal status | AU: Controlled (S8) | |
CA: Schedule I | ||
UK: Class A (CD) | ||
US: Schedule II |
An added benefit, per the current MOS, is that (invisible) list markup will be used, which is the more correct technical way to do it.
Thoughts? —[ AlanM1( talk)]— 09:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
{{
ubl}}
template is available for this:Legal status |
| |
Legal status |
|
{{
ubl}}
in action at
LB&SCR A1X Class W8 Freshwater. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
11:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Any objections if I add Al, Ca, Li, and Mg to the Formula field? Per Category:Drug pages needing formula fontification, there are a couple of pages each that would need these. -- ἀνυπόδητος ( talk) 20:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
In the article
Etorphine, the {{
Drugbox}} is displayed much too wide; this messes up the whole page. By trial and error I have tracked the problem to the parameter |StdInChI=
. Unfortunately, I do not understand what this is (I am not a chemist), so have no idea what would be the proper way to break this up. Hopefully, somebody else knows.
HairyWombat
04:27, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, people. I feel the need to request new bits of chemical information to be added to the drugbox, namely the following:
I would also think adding some dosing information would be nice but I understand (but don't necessarily agree) that this is to avoid the use of Wikipedia as a source of personal medical advice. Fuse809 ( talk) 10:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Blood-brain penetrability data isn't always available (and in my experience is rather rare) and hence there is still value to log P. Fuse809 ( talk) 01:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes if it has effects in the CNS it must cross the BBB but the extent is where log P comes in. Amisulpride, for instance, the antipsychotic isn't very lipophilic (low log P) and hence while it has CNS effects it has significantly more prominent peripheral effects such as hyperprolactinaemia. True polar surface area is a better predictor and hence I'd be glad to substitute it for log P if you so desire. As for its plasma binding well that's what the protein binding part of pharmacokinetic data is for. Fuse809 ( talk) 10:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Log P/PSA is good to have just because usually its a good predictor of CNS penetrability and activity. Yes there are other variables that can affect it such as protein binding to myelin but usually log P/PSA is a decent predictor. If CNS effects are observed it does penetrate the BBB but as I gave with the example of amisulpride the extent is relevant. If you go through all the CNS-affecting drugs in clinical practice blood-brain penetrability is very well predicted by log P/PSA. For instance fentanyl has a much higher log P (~3.89 vs. ~0.5) and lower PSA (23.55 Â2 vs. 52.93 Â2) than morphine and consequently it is far (x100) more potent an analgesic than morphine and produces fewer peripheral adverse effects (e.g. constipation, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, etc.). I will acknowledge that it isn't a perfect predictor but neither is any bit of clinical data seeing how there are individual differences. Fuse809 ( talk) 13:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
If you have experimental data on the penetrability of every clinically-utilised drug across the BBB then you must have an unprecedentedly extensive resource and in such a case I consider it selfish that you're not sharing it with wikipedia by encorporating it into our articles. P-glycoprotein mustn't do this to morphine that efficiently as it still has central effects but nonetheless other morphine-like opioids such as oxycodone are significantly less lipophilic than fentanyl and hence are significantly weaker and have more prominent peripheral side effects such as emesis, constipation and pruritus. Plus ionic molecules like methylnaltrexone have poor BBB penetrability and has a significantly lower log P than its non-ionic counterpart, naltrexone. Fuse809 ( talk) 04:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Is it possible to have this as a removeable value? There are many novel drugs for which there is no pregnancy category, and having a ? in these cases serves only to unncessarily extend the drugbox. The substances in question often have little information known so the articles are short and huge drugboxes become especially unecessary. Testem ( talk) 23:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone support adding an LD50 field? Exercisephys ( talk) 23:01, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request that the drugbox, in analogy to the chembox which can currently manage this, becomes capable of showing the structure of the two enantiomers of a drug, side-by-side. Fuse809 ( talk) 12:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Well tramadol is the drug I'd currently like to be able to do this with; the example I have of how the chembox can do this (albeit the two images side-by-side the way I want it aren't different enantiomers, just different 3D representations of the molecule) is on this page, 2C-P. Fuse809 ( talk) 17:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Here are the two codes: R-tramadol and S-tramadol. Fuse809 ( talk) 04:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I've updated the ChemSpider ID as follows, from:
| label46 = [[ChemSpider]] | data46 = {{#ifeq:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}}|NA||{{#if:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}} | <span class="reflink plainlinks nourlexpansion">[http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.{{{ChemSpiderID}}} {{{ChemSpiderID}}}]</span>{{{ChemSpiderID_Ref|}}} }}}}
to
| label46 = [[ChemSpider]] | data46 = {{#ifeq:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}}|NA||{{#if:{{{ChemSpiderID|}}} | <span class="reflink plainlinks nourlexpansion">[http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.{{{ChemSpiderID}}}.html {{{ChemSpiderID}}}]</span>{{{ChemSpiderID_Ref|}}} }}}}
This was in response to a request from the ChemSpider folks. The Drugbox was directing people to the disfavored link. -- Rifleman 82 ( talk) 13:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, people, I've already requested left and right 3D image fields so as to account for the possible isomerism of drug molecules and now I'm requesting some additional fields to account for isomerism. Namely, I think ChemSpider ID, PubChem, SMILES, StdInChIKey and StdInChI should have an additional field one can provide it with so that it takes into account the isomerism of drug molecules. For instance, tramadol has two isomers (+) and (-) which have ChemSpider IDs of 31105 and 580887, respectively. Fuse809 ( talk) 01:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
I have prepared some changes, in {{ Infobox drug/sandbox}}. See also {{ infobox drug/testcases}}.
|melting_high=
, will show using "... to ..." not a (more confusing) "–". Bad numerical input will be in the {{convert}} errorcategory.|SMILES=
as input for being the name (next to lowercase |smiles=
).I expect it can be put live shortly. - DePiep ( talk) 23:43, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
In {{ Infobox drug/doc}} I have listed the categories that are mentioned (filled) in the infobox. Some are redlinks. I guess the categorizing logic needs a review. - DePiep ( talk) 12:44, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed the drugbox has no legal categorisation for NZ and I'd like to request this change. Fuse809 ( talk) 11:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
The Co-codamol legal_UK field correctly includes both types: POM/P but no link(s) are generated. I manually linked as POM/ P. Widefox; talk 01:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Since pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov website supports HTTPS, I suggest switching the link to protocol-relative URL ( reason). Here is the change. Thanks! Chmarkine ( talk) 19:23, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Anyone know of a way to download all the drugboxes out there for analysis? I'm a researcher interested in analyzing this data. Dalek2point3 ( talk) 20:00, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I can't work out why the image on rivaroxaban is not displaying properly! JFW | T@lk 20:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Two things spawned from some comments at Talk:Tetracycline#Cartoon moved here and structure swapped. First, is there any standard for or against including animated 3D diagrams? Given the strong positions of the editor making them and others, I'd like to see some consensus (or at least note of the lack thereof) centralized. Second, what are editors' feelings regarding including an external link to a Jmol model, such as happens automatically (based on the SMILES field) in {{ chembox}}? DMacks ( talk) 00:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
~~ Copy-pasting someone else's viewpoint (from WT:MEDMOS) that I think is a revelation in this case as it made me change my mind! ~~ Brenton ( contribs · email · talk · uploads) 18:46, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Please add ONSET field to Pharmacokinetics. Please make it easy and obvious for non-experts to add such appropriate fields one-time ad hoc. (These templates feel very rigid and unfriendly to unexpert editors, quite un-WPish.) - 71.174.175.228 ( talk) 14:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
I noticed recently a number of pages appeared in Category:Drug_pages_needing_a_structure_drawing even though they contain images. It appears related to a switch from using the "image = " field to using "imageL =" and "imageR = ". See for example, this edit. Anyone know how to fix this? -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
-->{{main other|{{#if:{{{image|}}}{{{image2|}}}
-->{{main other|{{#if:{{{image|}}}{{{image2|}}}{{{imageL|}}}{{{imageR|}}}
This
edit request to
Template:Infobox drug has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
They moved the root from
Just substitute that line and it will work correctly. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 02:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
{{ Chembox}} already has permissible exposure limit aka PEL (a US legal limit). There is a proposal to add recommended exposure limit aka REL (US, non-legal). Any thoughts on adding both to this Drugbox? See current talk at WT:Chembox, REL. - DePiep ( talk) 09:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)