![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
decay width = 5.57 (25) eV per http://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/NdsEnsdf/showensdfdata.jsp?NucNo=8&NucID=BE Using standard decay width to time conversion ħ/Γ = half-life in s and applying error range to the same 1.18 (5) x 10-16s
So I would say that both values are incorrect as listed currently on the Table for this isotope. 24.8.144.79 ( talk) 07:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Given that an alpha particle happens to be a helium-4 nucleus in the first place, why is alpha decay ***to*** helium-4 not noted as fission if the daughter nuclei are identical? It would make more sense to note it that way in my opinion (and to that of the average reader) to denote it as such. Thank you. 2602:306:BCA6:AC60:28F0:1D2E:C6A4:796D ( talk) 07:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Given that the isotope EO4Be9 is the isotope that supplies the positrons for the Fermi positron acceleration experiments, why isn't there a description of how this is accomplished? Is that due to the decay of a proton or a neutron? And how can a point source contain a +1 electrostatic charge? WFPM ( talk) 21:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
It's from the May 1985 National Geographic article about the "Worlds within the Atom", where the element Beryllium is described as the source the "manufactured antiprotons" needed for the proton-antiproton collision experiments. And these "antiprotons would thus be negative unit charged particles with the same mass as the proton. I guess I'm wrong about the production of a positron, because the article says antiproton. But somehow, the interacting positive proton is causing the presumably EO4Be9 atom to emit a negative unit charged particle. And the question is what it would be after it did that? It's a good article, but I don't agree with its drawing portrayal of the nucleus of the EE6c12 Atomic nucleus. WFPM ( talk) 03:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC) PS In the Wiki antiproton article, it now says they're using a 29In (Indium) rod as a target. So I guess you have to keep close tabs on these things. WFPM ( talk) 02:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Could you tell us where you found that there is a possible 17Be? There is no site where it is mentionned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.92.224.178 ( talk) 20:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of beryllium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Beryllium-6 is an intermediate in the proton proton chain. 2 He-3 > Be-6 > He-4 + 2 H-1 . 2603:6000:8740:54B1:C941:7ADA:D88:9366 ( talk) 17:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't Beryllium-8 be listed as extinct, rather than synthetic? It's in helium fusing stars. 174.103.211.189 ( talk) 17:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The decay 6Be → 2He + 4He is energetially possible. 5He, 5Li, 6Be and 8Be are the only light nuclides that undergo alpha decay. 129.104.241.214 ( talk) 02:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
there are 6 isomers shown in the table but the first sentence says there are 3 isomers can someone fix 24.115.255.37 ( talk) 23:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
decay width = 5.57 (25) eV per http://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/NdsEnsdf/showensdfdata.jsp?NucNo=8&NucID=BE Using standard decay width to time conversion ħ/Γ = half-life in s and applying error range to the same 1.18 (5) x 10-16s
So I would say that both values are incorrect as listed currently on the Table for this isotope. 24.8.144.79 ( talk) 07:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Given that an alpha particle happens to be a helium-4 nucleus in the first place, why is alpha decay ***to*** helium-4 not noted as fission if the daughter nuclei are identical? It would make more sense to note it that way in my opinion (and to that of the average reader) to denote it as such. Thank you. 2602:306:BCA6:AC60:28F0:1D2E:C6A4:796D ( talk) 07:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Given that the isotope EO4Be9 is the isotope that supplies the positrons for the Fermi positron acceleration experiments, why isn't there a description of how this is accomplished? Is that due to the decay of a proton or a neutron? And how can a point source contain a +1 electrostatic charge? WFPM ( talk) 21:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
It's from the May 1985 National Geographic article about the "Worlds within the Atom", where the element Beryllium is described as the source the "manufactured antiprotons" needed for the proton-antiproton collision experiments. And these "antiprotons would thus be negative unit charged particles with the same mass as the proton. I guess I'm wrong about the production of a positron, because the article says antiproton. But somehow, the interacting positive proton is causing the presumably EO4Be9 atom to emit a negative unit charged particle. And the question is what it would be after it did that? It's a good article, but I don't agree with its drawing portrayal of the nucleus of the EE6c12 Atomic nucleus. WFPM ( talk) 03:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC) PS In the Wiki antiproton article, it now says they're using a 29In (Indium) rod as a target. So I guess you have to keep close tabs on these things. WFPM ( talk) 02:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Could you tell us where you found that there is a possible 17Be? There is no site where it is mentionned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.92.224.178 ( talk) 20:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Isotopes of beryllium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:09, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Beryllium-6 is an intermediate in the proton proton chain. 2 He-3 > Be-6 > He-4 + 2 H-1 . 2603:6000:8740:54B1:C941:7ADA:D88:9366 ( talk) 17:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Shouldn't Beryllium-8 be listed as extinct, rather than synthetic? It's in helium fusing stars. 174.103.211.189 ( talk) 17:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The decay 6Be → 2He + 4He is energetially possible. 5He, 5Li, 6Be and 8Be are the only light nuclides that undergo alpha decay. 129.104.241.214 ( talk) 02:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
there are 6 isomers shown in the table but the first sentence says there are 3 isomers can someone fix 24.115.255.37 ( talk) 23:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)