![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Should the template be updated to use Infobox settlement, as shown in these test cases? eh bien mon prince ( talk) 05:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've added a line to the template which will add the line Former municipality of Switzerland to any article that has the municipality type set to former. This will make the current legal status of the municipality clearer. The complete text is here Template:Infobox Swiss town/sandbox and the test cases are here Template:Infobox Swiss town/testcases. Can some admin please copy the text from the sandbox over to the current template? Tobyc75 ( talk) 12:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
This could better be resolved by making this template a wrapper for {{ infobox settlement}}, as suggested above, Note that {{ Infobox Swiss town former}} is already such a wrapper; and the two could also be merged. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
It's clear that there is little support for converting this to a wrapper for infobox settlement so this issue needs to be revisited. Should we make the changes to this template as per the original request? --
AussieLegend (
✉)
16:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request that the current version of the template be replaced with this version from the sandbox. This request was initially made above but was opposed with a rationale that the template be converted to be a wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}. That proposal has received little support and there has been no further opposition to the proposed changes in over 3 months so there seems no reason why the originally proposed changes cannot be implemented at this time. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 09:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. I let this sit all day to see if another qualified individual supported the change, and it's still sitting here. So, my take on this request is that although there is little support for making it a wrapper for {{
Infobox settlement}}, I also don't see any consensus or support to bloat this template out further than it already is. Please develop a consensus for this change and thoroughly test it in the sandbox and set |ans=no
and we can make it happen.
Technical 13 (
talk)
02:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
{{Infobox Swiss town former}}
. The "bloat" he claimed is a mere 288 bytes, 1.8% of the current size. As discussed above, the extra complexity of Infobox Swiss town former results in effectively bloating template usage by 288%. The only other opposition had nothing to do with bloating, it was merely support for converting the template to use {{Infobox settlement}}
. Based on the discussions to date, I don't see a reason for rejecting the proposed changes based on apparent bloating. That said, I can understand Technical 13's to implement the changes based on recent events at {{
Infobox television}} where an apparently simple change wasn't as simple. That was not Technical 13's fault by any means, it was caused by somebody using the template in a way that it had not been designed for. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
07:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Support. The discussion above revolved around the creation of {{Infobox Swiss town former}}
which while looking similar was totally different under the hood. It was a wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}
which was much, much larger and there was no consensus for creating the wrapper. The current template already included a line for former municipalities and so the former template was redundant. However, I like the way that the Former municipality of Switzerland line looked and thought it made it easier to see the current status of the municipality. So I added a couple of lines to create the label if the municipality type was set to former. I also just added a couple of lines to check for 2014 maps. I've checked the template with the test cases and everything looked good.
Tobyc75 (
talk)
16:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've updated the sandbox version to include looking for 2014 municipal maps. The only change is to add 2 lines that check for the newest maps for any district that underwent a change on 1 January 2014. I need to have the current version replaced with this version sandbox. The change was tested on the testcases and it worked correctly for all the test cases. Thanks Tobyc75 ( talk) 05:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be very relevant to include a field that shows which metropolitan area the town is part of? Keizers ( talk) 14:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello together, I would like to reduce time and source parameters in the Swiss population data templates to just one for each (at the moment there are six parameter for time an two parameters for the source): These modification would make update of these templates here as well in other languages considerably less time consuming, but requires some adaptations in the template Infobox Swiss town as well as in the template Swiss populations date and related templates. So far I made these modifications in sandbox templates (see my latest edits), they work without causing obvious errors and without changing their functionality. The sandbox templates I modified are: [8], [9], [10], [11] and [12]. -- Septembermorgen ( talk) 16:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I see absolutely no reason why Switzerland needs it's own infobox and the current template looks dated, poorly organized and inferior in scope to infobox settlement. Consistency is the way to go. It is annoying to visit Swiss towns and have to scroll down to even see the pin map let alone district map.
I suggest creating a wrapper for infobox settlement:
After a week, we have seven "support" and only a lone "oppose". It's time to close this and enact the changes.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
12:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've updated the sandbox version to include looking for 2015 municipal maps. The only change is to add 2 lines that check for the newest maps for any district that underwent a change on 1 January 2015. I need to have the current version replaced with this version sandbox. The change was tested on the testcases and it worked correctly for all the test cases. Thanks Tobyc75 ( talk) 00:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld has informed me that there is an issue with the "automatic local map" in
Sant'Abbondio. the problem is as follows,
so, since there is no
File:Karte Gemeinde Sant'Abbondio 2009.png, no map is found. to resolve this, we could change
Template:SFOS2Municipality to return "Sant' Abbondio" (with a space) but would this screw up anything else?
Frietjes (
talk)
16:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
|municipality_name=
or |map=
, will do that instead. I moved that chunk of code to a subtemplate and added some tracking so we can find ones that have map errors, or are not using the most up-to-date maps.
Frietjes (
talk)
16:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the template with the version found at Template:Infobox Swiss town/sandbox2. The sandbox2 version changes the location map from just showing Switzerland to showing 2 location maps, either the country or the canton or both. It uses the location = Switzerland#Canton of xxxx. Tobyc75 ( talk) 15:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the template sometimes includes a wrong link to a coat of arms of ... page. It will include such a link automatically if it exists (through the #ifexist:Coat of arms of {{{subject_name}}}
fragment, but there is no guarantee that that is actually the correct page. On
Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland, subject_name is set to Saint-Barthélemy, and the template automatically includes a link to
Coat of arms of Saint-Barthélemy (another Saint-Barthélemy unfortunately). Should I change subject_name on the target page to Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland, or should this template be changed to allow the configuration of the correct value (e.g. link_coa = Coat of arms of Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland
)?
Thanks in advance for your response! Den Hieperboree ( talk) 22:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
| timezone_link = Time in Switzerland | timezone1 = Central European Time | utc_offset1 = UTC+01:00 | timezone1_DST = Central European Summer Time | utc_offset1_DST = UTC+02:00
TerraCyprus ( talk) 21:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
No type shown for most of the items.
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
please change to
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}{{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | municipality | [[municipalities of Switzerland|municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
TerraCyprus ( talk) 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
city
, or municipality and city
? I think this might benefit from a switch statement that accounts for acceptable values that are used in actual articles. Also the note in the documentation starting with "Used to add the categories..." does not appear to be correct. Was that functionality removed? If so, was the removal intentional? –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
20:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
|municipality_type=
does not allow for anything else than "municipality" and "former", because "municipality" is the type and "former municipality" some fake type denoting that the municipality was abolished.
TerraCyprus (
talk)
20:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] | [[Municipalities of Switzerland|Municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
|municipality_code=
and |municipality_type=
!= "former".
Jonesey95, I cannot find a mistake with your code. Maybe in the future the box could be substituted for the former municipalities, then allways type=municipality.
TerraCyprus (
talk)
00:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
I am unable to follow the confusing history of this template and its wrappers, but it appears that |municipality_name=
may have been a valid parameter with some function in the past. It is being marked as an unsupported parameter. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
15:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
|website=
has a lot of uses; was it valid at some point in the past? –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
15:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
|languages=
. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
16:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Copied from Template_talk:Infobox_Swiss_town:
This request is done, but the target template needs some work. For example: the population handling w.r.t. Wikidata is totally bust. It is forcing
Zürich to show 2018 years when 2020 ones are being explicitly provided on the page on enwiki (see source). |popofyear=
is widely used as a year param, but it's not even supported by the template itself it seems? Looks like only the month/year combo param is. Parameter deprecation runs would also be helpful (by bot); looks like a few editors attempted some by hand yesterday. Lots of very old deprecated params here causing confusion it looks like.
ProcrastinatingReader (
talk)
01:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
I've setup Category:Pages using infobox Switzerland municipality with manual population for tracking. This is all the articles where we (a) have a Wikidata population and (b) have a manual population parameter, hence the Wikidata data is overriding and the local data is not being shown(!). On some, like Zürich, Wikidata is outdated. On others, our local articles have 2004 dates or so. People, naturally, probably didn't want to maintain it if it doesn't show up anyway. But this is really something we should fix, one way or another, I think. Forced Wikidata values seems controversial. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Why not simply update Wikidata and be done? It would also be helpful for other Wikipedias, i.e. the WMF movement as a whole. TerraCyprus ( talk) 04:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@
Frietjes:
This change is causing script errors on any pages that pass popofyear
but not populationof
, such as
Neunkirch. What's supposed to happen in that case?
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
01:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
|popofyear=
, but in most cases the year is already in |populationof=
, so the check is supposed to disable tracking of |popofyear=
when the value is a substring of the value in |populationof=
. if there is no |populationof=
then the string replacement would act on a blank string, so this would also result in no tracking.
Frietjes (
talk)
16:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Infobox Switzerland municipality has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template currently produces the text Municipality of Switzerland under the subject name in the resulting infobox. That is not how we express such a term in English. It should read Swiss municipality or maybe Municipality in Switzerland. "Municipality of Switzerland" is how you would refer to a municipality named Switzerland. Eric talk 18:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Greetings and felicitations. Would someone please be so kind as to add a plural option for the postal_code field? I checked both the documentation and the talk page archives and can't find one, nor does making the field plural ("postal_codes") currently work. (Please be so kind as to {{
ping}}
me when you respond.) —05:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
|postal_code=
as usual. You can see the new code in action at
Geneva. Not pinging because you did not sign with your user name. Please fix your signature. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
13:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Infobox Switzerland municipality has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you add "imagepath_flag"? Every municipality has a flag alongside with a coat of arm just like the cantons. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC) SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
{{{population_total}}}
and {{{population_as_of}}}
parameters.
Elli (
talk |
contribs)
09:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add parentheses before and after the listed political party of the mayor,so that the format is displayed as MAYOR (PARTY) instead of MAYOR PARTY. For example: Michele Foletti (Ticino League). HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 20:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Should the template be updated to use Infobox settlement, as shown in these test cases? eh bien mon prince ( talk) 05:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've added a line to the template which will add the line Former municipality of Switzerland to any article that has the municipality type set to former. This will make the current legal status of the municipality clearer. The complete text is here Template:Infobox Swiss town/sandbox and the test cases are here Template:Infobox Swiss town/testcases. Can some admin please copy the text from the sandbox over to the current template? Tobyc75 ( talk) 12:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
This could better be resolved by making this template a wrapper for {{ infobox settlement}}, as suggested above, Note that {{ Infobox Swiss town former}} is already such a wrapper; and the two could also be merged. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
It's clear that there is little support for converting this to a wrapper for infobox settlement so this issue needs to be revisited. Should we make the changes to this template as per the original request? --
AussieLegend (
✉)
16:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request that the current version of the template be replaced with this version from the sandbox. This request was initially made above but was opposed with a rationale that the template be converted to be a wrapper for {{ Infobox settlement}}. That proposal has received little support and there has been no further opposition to the proposed changes in over 3 months so there seems no reason why the originally proposed changes cannot be implemented at this time. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 09:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. I let this sit all day to see if another qualified individual supported the change, and it's still sitting here. So, my take on this request is that although there is little support for making it a wrapper for {{
Infobox settlement}}, I also don't see any consensus or support to bloat this template out further than it already is. Please develop a consensus for this change and thoroughly test it in the sandbox and set |ans=no
and we can make it happen.
Technical 13 (
talk)
02:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
{{Infobox Swiss town former}}
. The "bloat" he claimed is a mere 288 bytes, 1.8% of the current size. As discussed above, the extra complexity of Infobox Swiss town former results in effectively bloating template usage by 288%. The only other opposition had nothing to do with bloating, it was merely support for converting the template to use {{Infobox settlement}}
. Based on the discussions to date, I don't see a reason for rejecting the proposed changes based on apparent bloating. That said, I can understand Technical 13's to implement the changes based on recent events at {{
Infobox television}} where an apparently simple change wasn't as simple. That was not Technical 13's fault by any means, it was caused by somebody using the template in a way that it had not been designed for. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
07:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Support. The discussion above revolved around the creation of {{Infobox Swiss town former}}
which while looking similar was totally different under the hood. It was a wrapper for {{Infobox settlement}}
which was much, much larger and there was no consensus for creating the wrapper. The current template already included a line for former municipalities and so the former template was redundant. However, I like the way that the Former municipality of Switzerland line looked and thought it made it easier to see the current status of the municipality. So I added a couple of lines to create the label if the municipality type was set to former. I also just added a couple of lines to check for 2014 maps. I've checked the template with the test cases and everything looked good.
Tobyc75 (
talk)
16:00, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've updated the sandbox version to include looking for 2014 municipal maps. The only change is to add 2 lines that check for the newest maps for any district that underwent a change on 1 January 2014. I need to have the current version replaced with this version sandbox. The change was tested on the testcases and it worked correctly for all the test cases. Thanks Tobyc75 ( talk) 05:52, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be very relevant to include a field that shows which metropolitan area the town is part of? Keizers ( talk) 14:32, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello together, I would like to reduce time and source parameters in the Swiss population data templates to just one for each (at the moment there are six parameter for time an two parameters for the source): These modification would make update of these templates here as well in other languages considerably less time consuming, but requires some adaptations in the template Infobox Swiss town as well as in the template Swiss populations date and related templates. So far I made these modifications in sandbox templates (see my latest edits), they work without causing obvious errors and without changing their functionality. The sandbox templates I modified are: [8], [9], [10], [11] and [12]. -- Septembermorgen ( talk) 16:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I see absolutely no reason why Switzerland needs it's own infobox and the current template looks dated, poorly organized and inferior in scope to infobox settlement. Consistency is the way to go. It is annoying to visit Swiss towns and have to scroll down to even see the pin map let alone district map.
I suggest creating a wrapper for infobox settlement:
After a week, we have seven "support" and only a lone "oppose". It's time to close this and enact the changes.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits
12:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I've updated the sandbox version to include looking for 2015 municipal maps. The only change is to add 2 lines that check for the newest maps for any district that underwent a change on 1 January 2015. I need to have the current version replaced with this version sandbox. The change was tested on the testcases and it worked correctly for all the test cases. Thanks Tobyc75 ( talk) 00:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld has informed me that there is an issue with the "automatic local map" in
Sant'Abbondio. the problem is as follows,
so, since there is no
File:Karte Gemeinde Sant'Abbondio 2009.png, no map is found. to resolve this, we could change
Template:SFOS2Municipality to return "Sant' Abbondio" (with a space) but would this screw up anything else?
Frietjes (
talk)
16:12, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
|municipality_name=
or |map=
, will do that instead. I moved that chunk of code to a subtemplate and added some tracking so we can find ones that have map errors, or are not using the most up-to-date maps.
Frietjes (
talk)
16:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace the template with the version found at Template:Infobox Swiss town/sandbox2. The sandbox2 version changes the location map from just showing Switzerland to showing 2 location maps, either the country or the canton or both. It uses the location = Switzerland#Canton of xxxx. Tobyc75 ( talk) 15:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the template sometimes includes a wrong link to a coat of arms of ... page. It will include such a link automatically if it exists (through the #ifexist:Coat of arms of {{{subject_name}}}
fragment, but there is no guarantee that that is actually the correct page. On
Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland, subject_name is set to Saint-Barthélemy, and the template automatically includes a link to
Coat of arms of Saint-Barthélemy (another Saint-Barthélemy unfortunately). Should I change subject_name on the target page to Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland, or should this template be changed to allow the configuration of the correct value (e.g. link_coa = Coat of arms of Saint-Barthélemy, Switzerland
)?
Thanks in advance for your response! Den Hieperboree ( talk) 22:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC).
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
| timezone_link = Time in Switzerland | timezone1 = Central European Time | utc_offset1 = UTC+01:00 | timezone1_DST = Central European Summer Time | utc_offset1_DST = UTC+02:00
TerraCyprus ( talk) 21:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
No type shown for most of the items.
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
please change to
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}{{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | municipality | [[municipalities of Switzerland|municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
TerraCyprus ( talk) 19:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
city
, or municipality and city
? I think this might benefit from a switch statement that accounts for acceptable values that are used in actual articles. Also the note in the documentation starting with "Used to add the categories..." does not appear to be correct. Was that functionality removed? If so, was the removal intentional? –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
20:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
|municipality_type=
does not allow for anything else than "municipality" and "former", because "municipality" is the type and "former municipality" some fake type denoting that the municipality was abolished.
TerraCyprus (
talk)
20:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
| settlement_type = {{#ifeq:{{{municipality_type|}}} | former | [[List of former municipalities of Switzerland|Former municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] | [[Municipalities of Switzerland|Municipality]] of [[Switzerland]] }}
|municipality_code=
and |municipality_type=
!= "former".
Jonesey95, I cannot find a mistake with your code. Maybe in the future the box could be substituted for the former municipalities, then allways type=municipality.
TerraCyprus (
talk)
00:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
I am unable to follow the confusing history of this template and its wrappers, but it appears that |municipality_name=
may have been a valid parameter with some function in the past. It is being marked as an unsupported parameter. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
15:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
|website=
has a lot of uses; was it valid at some point in the past? –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
15:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
|languages=
. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
16:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Copied from Template_talk:Infobox_Swiss_town:
This request is done, but the target template needs some work. For example: the population handling w.r.t. Wikidata is totally bust. It is forcing
Zürich to show 2018 years when 2020 ones are being explicitly provided on the page on enwiki (see source). |popofyear=
is widely used as a year param, but it's not even supported by the template itself it seems? Looks like only the month/year combo param is. Parameter deprecation runs would also be helpful (by bot); looks like a few editors attempted some by hand yesterday. Lots of very old deprecated params here causing confusion it looks like.
ProcrastinatingReader (
talk)
01:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
I've setup Category:Pages using infobox Switzerland municipality with manual population for tracking. This is all the articles where we (a) have a Wikidata population and (b) have a manual population parameter, hence the Wikidata data is overriding and the local data is not being shown(!). On some, like Zürich, Wikidata is outdated. On others, our local articles have 2004 dates or so. People, naturally, probably didn't want to maintain it if it doesn't show up anyway. But this is really something we should fix, one way or another, I think. Forced Wikidata values seems controversial. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 16:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Why not simply update Wikidata and be done? It would also be helpful for other Wikipedias, i.e. the WMF movement as a whole. TerraCyprus ( talk) 04:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
@
Frietjes:
This change is causing script errors on any pages that pass popofyear
but not populationof
, such as
Neunkirch. What's supposed to happen in that case?
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
01:46, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
|popofyear=
, but in most cases the year is already in |populationof=
, so the check is supposed to disable tracking of |popofyear=
when the value is a substring of the value in |populationof=
. if there is no |populationof=
then the string replacement would act on a blank string, so this would also result in no tracking.
Frietjes (
talk)
16:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Infobox Switzerland municipality has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template currently produces the text Municipality of Switzerland under the subject name in the resulting infobox. That is not how we express such a term in English. It should read Swiss municipality or maybe Municipality in Switzerland. "Municipality of Switzerland" is how you would refer to a municipality named Switzerland. Eric talk 18:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Greetings and felicitations. Would someone please be so kind as to add a plural option for the postal_code field? I checked both the documentation and the talk page archives and can't find one, nor does making the field plural ("postal_codes") currently work. (Please be so kind as to {{
ping}}
me when you respond.) —05:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
|postal_code=
as usual. You can see the new code in action at
Geneva. Not pinging because you did not sign with your user name. Please fix your signature. –
Jonesey95 (
talk)
13:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Template:Infobox Switzerland municipality has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you add "imagepath_flag"? Every municipality has a flag alongside with a coat of arm just like the cantons. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC) SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 01:30, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
{{{population_total}}}
and {{{population_as_of}}}
parameters.
Elli (
talk |
contribs)
09:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add parentheses before and after the listed political party of the mayor,so that the format is displayed as MAYOR (PARTY) instead of MAYOR PARTY. For example: Michele Foletti (Ticino League). HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 20:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)