![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I would like to change the "Pro Tour Top 8" and "Grand Prix Top 8" to include wins as well. For footballers for example their stats are shown as "Games played (goals)" and I think a similar format could very well be applied here, too: "Grand Prixs won (Top 8)" This way all major achievements of a player would be available at a glance. Comments? Opposition? OdinFK ( talk) 08:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I suggest adding the debut Pro Tour of a player to the infobox. In my opinion this is much more meaningful than many of the other stats presented. Arguably one could also include the last PT a player attended although this is a bit tedious to update. In each case the finish in that PT could also be added in brackets. OdinFK ( talk) 13:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
As the Total Rating has become the main rating for all players wouldn't it make sense to replace the highest Limited and highest Constructed Rating with highest Total rating? Actually that may be hard to find, but I don't think the other rating categories merit inclusion anymore since only Total is really good for anything anymore. OdinFK ( talk) 23:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
In the previous post I suggested replacing Highest Limited/Constructed Rating with Highest Total. While it made sense at the time I forgot about it and now we have Planeswalker Points. I think Highest Ratings Categories should be removed and replaced with Planeswalker Points. Highest Rating were always incredibly hard to come by. They were basically inspired by the late Pro Player cards but these days this information is almost always original research and apt to be not up to date. Planeswalker Levels on the other hand are easy to look up for everybody and the mean Wizards currently uses to rank players. Any approval or disapproval about this? OdinFK ( talk) 09:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Heya there, I came across the infobox within Brock Parker's article and actually didn't know what "Grand Prix" and "Pro Tour" was referring to (nor the infobox as a whole) until I looked it up. I've noticed that they each have an article already and feel like it'd be easier to understand what the infobox as a whole is referring to if they were given interwiki links. Would that be okay with everybody? JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San ( talk) 11:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Although this is information that often needs updating, I thought it'd be a useful stat to have. The issue is that there is no official reference to point to (beyond simply the Event Coverage Archive); one would have to make this calculation manually. That said, I'm entirely capable and willing to do this. Hahahopp ( talk) 10:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Pro Tour History | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I would like to change the "Pro Tour Top 8" and "Grand Prix Top 8" to include wins as well. For footballers for example their stats are shown as "Games played (goals)" and I think a similar format could very well be applied here, too: "Grand Prixs won (Top 8)" This way all major achievements of a player would be available at a glance. Comments? Opposition? OdinFK ( talk) 08:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I suggest adding the debut Pro Tour of a player to the infobox. In my opinion this is much more meaningful than many of the other stats presented. Arguably one could also include the last PT a player attended although this is a bit tedious to update. In each case the finish in that PT could also be added in brackets. OdinFK ( talk) 13:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
As the Total Rating has become the main rating for all players wouldn't it make sense to replace the highest Limited and highest Constructed Rating with highest Total rating? Actually that may be hard to find, but I don't think the other rating categories merit inclusion anymore since only Total is really good for anything anymore. OdinFK ( talk) 23:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
In the previous post I suggested replacing Highest Limited/Constructed Rating with Highest Total. While it made sense at the time I forgot about it and now we have Planeswalker Points. I think Highest Ratings Categories should be removed and replaced with Planeswalker Points. Highest Rating were always incredibly hard to come by. They were basically inspired by the late Pro Player cards but these days this information is almost always original research and apt to be not up to date. Planeswalker Levels on the other hand are easy to look up for everybody and the mean Wizards currently uses to rank players. Any approval or disapproval about this? OdinFK ( talk) 09:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Heya there, I came across the infobox within Brock Parker's article and actually didn't know what "Grand Prix" and "Pro Tour" was referring to (nor the infobox as a whole) until I looked it up. I've noticed that they each have an article already and feel like it'd be easier to understand what the infobox as a whole is referring to if they were given interwiki links. Would that be okay with everybody? JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San ( talk) 11:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Although this is information that often needs updating, I thought it'd be a useful stat to have. The issue is that there is no official reference to point to (beyond simply the Event Coverage Archive); one would have to make this calculation manually. That said, I'm entirely capable and willing to do this. Hahahopp ( talk) 10:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Pro Tour History | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|