This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hey, wondering if it would be okay to add a 'Concepts' subsection (like I made for the Chinese philosophy template. Not being particularly knowledgable about the subject, my prelimary list would be: Adharma, Ahiṃsā, Anātman, Ātman, Avidyā, Bhāvana, Dharma, Dukkha, Guṇa, Jñāna, Karma, Māyā, Mokṣa, Nirvāṇa, Pratītyasamutpāda, Prajñā, Prakṛti, Rajamandala, Ṛta, Saṃsāra, Satya, Satyagraha, Skandhas, Smṛti, Śūnyatā, Upādāna, Vijñāna, Vipāka. Basically, I'd love to see a list of concepts that are either 1. incredibly important to one school of thought, and/or 2. shared across several schools of thought. Ideas? Suggestions? Dan Cottrell ( talk) 15:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
This should be renamed to Indian philosophy. -- Babub→ Talk 02:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I can't understand why we have 2 groups about texts. I understand a merge. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 06:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
According to Āstika and nāstika page: "The main schools of Indian philosophy that reject the Vedas were regarded as heterodox in the Brahmanical tradition. It's strange that Indian philosophy is divided as per the Brahmanical tradition. This is not the right way when in fact Jains don't agree that they are nāstika. They accept the existence of soul, they accept that God exists and direct all their efforts to attain Godhood. It's high time that we give some space to the views of non-brahmanical traditions. Classifying Jainism as a nāstika philosophy confuses the reader and doesn't represent it anyway. Better wording is needed. Also, in the philosophers section, not a single philosopher seems to be a Jaina. This is also sad. Jaina philosophers have contributed so much to philosophy and logic. — Nimit ( talk) 16:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Buddhism and Jainism aren't actually Nastika philosophies. They have always denied being Nastika. Hindu scriptures labelling them as "Nastika" is akin to when Muslims label all non-Sunni sects as infidels.
They should be in an Astika (Others) category whereas the current 'Hindu' Astika category should be labelled Astika (Sat-Astika Darshan). Sprocket Crocket ( talk) 03:35, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hey, wondering if it would be okay to add a 'Concepts' subsection (like I made for the Chinese philosophy template. Not being particularly knowledgable about the subject, my prelimary list would be: Adharma, Ahiṃsā, Anātman, Ātman, Avidyā, Bhāvana, Dharma, Dukkha, Guṇa, Jñāna, Karma, Māyā, Mokṣa, Nirvāṇa, Pratītyasamutpāda, Prajñā, Prakṛti, Rajamandala, Ṛta, Saṃsāra, Satya, Satyagraha, Skandhas, Smṛti, Śūnyatā, Upādāna, Vijñāna, Vipāka. Basically, I'd love to see a list of concepts that are either 1. incredibly important to one school of thought, and/or 2. shared across several schools of thought. Ideas? Suggestions? Dan Cottrell ( talk) 15:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
This should be renamed to Indian philosophy. -- Babub→ Talk 02:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
I can't understand why we have 2 groups about texts. I understand a merge. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 06:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
According to Āstika and nāstika page: "The main schools of Indian philosophy that reject the Vedas were regarded as heterodox in the Brahmanical tradition. It's strange that Indian philosophy is divided as per the Brahmanical tradition. This is not the right way when in fact Jains don't agree that they are nāstika. They accept the existence of soul, they accept that God exists and direct all their efforts to attain Godhood. It's high time that we give some space to the views of non-brahmanical traditions. Classifying Jainism as a nāstika philosophy confuses the reader and doesn't represent it anyway. Better wording is needed. Also, in the philosophers section, not a single philosopher seems to be a Jaina. This is also sad. Jaina philosophers have contributed so much to philosophy and logic. — Nimit ( talk) 16:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Buddhism and Jainism aren't actually Nastika philosophies. They have always denied being Nastika. Hindu scriptures labelling them as "Nastika" is akin to when Muslims label all non-Sunni sects as infidels.
They should be in an Astika (Others) category whereas the current 'Hindu' Astika category should be labelled Astika (Sat-Astika Darshan). Sprocket Crocket ( talk) 03:35, 14 April 2018 (UTC)