This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hi, you reverted my recent changes to the template, asserting that they were incorrect. The changes are in fact correct - I linked to the relevant articles. The term "United Kingdom" as used today is short for "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", and before that after the act of union in 1801, it included all of Ireland. Can you explain why you believe the edits are incorrect? I'll watch this page for a reply. Thank you. -- Bardcom ( talk) 08:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
(outdent)Copied above to here -- Bardcom ( talk) 10:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Surely more to the point this chart says that the House of Stuart covered the entirity of the 17th century. But I don't think it's controversial to mention that the Common Welath and Protectorate cannot, under any sensible definaition, be described as coming under the House of Stuart. This chart essentially wipes out one of the most important periods of English history. Perhaps people might prefer the description "inter-regnum" although personally I don't think that's straight talking.
Poor old Cromwell earned his place in history - let's not wipe him out of it. -- JimJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.102.176 ( talk) 18:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Hi, you reverted my recent changes to the template, asserting that they were incorrect. The changes are in fact correct - I linked to the relevant articles. The term "United Kingdom" as used today is short for "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland", and before that after the act of union in 1801, it included all of Ireland. Can you explain why you believe the edits are incorrect? I'll watch this page for a reply. Thank you. -- Bardcom ( talk) 08:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
(outdent)Copied above to here -- Bardcom ( talk) 10:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Surely more to the point this chart says that the House of Stuart covered the entirity of the 17th century. But I don't think it's controversial to mention that the Common Welath and Protectorate cannot, under any sensible definaition, be described as coming under the House of Stuart. This chart essentially wipes out one of the most important periods of English history. Perhaps people might prefer the description "inter-regnum" although personally I don't think that's straight talking.
Poor old Cromwell earned his place in history - let's not wipe him out of it. -- JimJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.102.176 ( talk) 18:02, 24 August 2008 (UTC)