 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Does anyone else believe that it might be time to split this template? (In similar fashion to the {{ Time Persons of the Year}} template.) If no one has objections, I'll make an attempt to split it as such. – Latics ( talk) 05:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- The example you mentioned is not smaller than what we have now. And, with the Time template, there could be multiple names per year, so its naturally longer. I don't think any modification to this template is needed. But that's my opinion.—
NMajdan•
talk
13:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- (Sorry for the late reply) I understand that it's not smaller, but I do believe it's neater and easier to navigate. – Latics ( talk) 06:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Does anyone else believe that it might be time to split this template? (In similar fashion to the {{ Time Persons of the Year}} template.) If no one has objections, I'll make an attempt to split it as such. – Latics ( talk) 05:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- The example you mentioned is not smaller than what we have now. And, with the Time template, there could be multiple names per year, so its naturally longer. I don't think any modification to this template is needed. But that's my opinion.—
NMajdan•
talk
13:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- (Sorry for the late reply) I understand that it's not smaller, but I do believe it's neater and easier to navigate. – Latics ( talk) 06:30, 5 January 2010 (UTC)