This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could we separate adaptations from films? Then we could have an "On Screen" section, linked by the main article (and not in a misleading way). We could call the adaptations section "Performances/Adaptations". I'm sure that we will expand enough to add more adaptations to the list. Wrad 18:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed The Lion King from the list of adaptations. Even taking Vogler's recollection literally (as opposed to, for instance, interpreting it as Disney saying nothing more than "make the story more epic, better, emotionally involving" - common colloquial use of "Hamlet"), we're stil left with nothing more than "loose inspiration". If one squints hard enough, pretty much any story can be an adaptation of Hamlet - though I don't advise actually trying this out (therein madness lies). -- Badger Drink ( talk) 20:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted the latest change because I am unsure whether it is an improvement. The normal route is to name the version for the director but this is a mixture of stars and directors. Can we have some sort of consensus on this before changing the template? -- ROGER DAVIES talk 15:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Should they be included? David Senek ( talk) 12:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could we separate adaptations from films? Then we could have an "On Screen" section, linked by the main article (and not in a misleading way). We could call the adaptations section "Performances/Adaptations". I'm sure that we will expand enough to add more adaptations to the list. Wrad 18:26, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I have removed The Lion King from the list of adaptations. Even taking Vogler's recollection literally (as opposed to, for instance, interpreting it as Disney saying nothing more than "make the story more epic, better, emotionally involving" - common colloquial use of "Hamlet"), we're stil left with nothing more than "loose inspiration". If one squints hard enough, pretty much any story can be an adaptation of Hamlet - though I don't advise actually trying this out (therein madness lies). -- Badger Drink ( talk) 20:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted the latest change because I am unsure whether it is an improvement. The normal route is to name the version for the director but this is a mixture of stars and directors. Can we have some sort of consensus on this before changing the template? -- ROGER DAVIES talk 15:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Should they be included? David Senek ( talk) 12:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)