This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
is there any reason why the colour has to match up with other templates? I note that the communist party has a template that is red. It makes sense that the green template should be green no?
Eleutherius (
talk)
08:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Is there a version of green that would suit? It seems appropriate to me to have colour that reflects the colours of the organisations being talked about.
Eleutherius (
talk)
14:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
rather not, better to just keep them all the same. the excessive branding can be accomplished through images in the respective articles.
Frietjes (
talk)
15:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
is there any reason why the colour has to match up with other templates? I note that the communist party has a template that is red. It makes sense that the green template should be green no?
Eleutherius (
talk)
08:08, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Is there a version of green that would suit? It seems appropriate to me to have colour that reflects the colours of the organisations being talked about.
Eleutherius (
talk)
14:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
rather not, better to just keep them all the same. the excessive branding can be accomplished through images in the respective articles.
Frietjes (
talk)
15:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Done This has apparently been done.
Bcharles (
talk)
05:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)