United States: Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
International relations Template‑class | |||||||
|
ROC or Taiwan is not a country recognised by USA,so how can a non-country be categorised in the international bilateral relation?-- Ksyrie 01:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone else reckon this template looks cluttered with all those flag icons? Sardanaphalus 12:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I removed the highly-POV Tibet entry. United States government has since the ROC era(1912-1949) recognized Tibet as part of China.
"For its part, the Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and the Chinese Constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims" [State Department, FRUS 1943, p630]
219.79.122.72 ( talk) 16:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change
* [[China–United States relations|China]] ** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]] * [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]] * [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]]
to
* [[China–United States relations|China]] ** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]] ** [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]] * [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]]
since both Macau and Hong Kong are part of China (see Special administrative region of China). But the previous version only deems the latter to be, which is factually incorrect. 117.158.156.68 ( talk) 10:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could the flag icon please be removed in line with WP:ICONDECORATION? Thanks, 207.161.86.162 ( talk) 18:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I currently have a draft waiting for review on the relations between Abkhazia and the United States. If it were to be accepted, on the foreign relations template for the United States, would a separate section have to be created in the bilateral section under the listing of former states? Or would it go under Asia Western where Georgia is listed under a double bullet point next to Georgia as the majority of countries view Abkhazia as part of Georgia? -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious about why Mexico is in the Central America section. I do understand that some geographic criteria give room for Mexico to be considered a part of such a region, but as far as my knowledge goes, Mexico is considered North American by both Mexicans themselves and Central Americans.
On the other hand, however, I wonder if this distinction in this particular template is based on a cultural background, since Canada shares far more cultural traits with the United States than Mexico does, and as such some people conisder North America a direct equivalent of Anglo-America (sans Caribbean countries).
United States: Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
International relations Template‑class | |||||||
|
ROC or Taiwan is not a country recognised by USA,so how can a non-country be categorised in the international bilateral relation?-- Ksyrie 01:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone else reckon this template looks cluttered with all those flag icons? Sardanaphalus 12:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I removed the highly-POV Tibet entry. United States government has since the ROC era(1912-1949) recognized Tibet as part of China.
"For its part, the Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and the Chinese Constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a question regarding either of those claims" [State Department, FRUS 1943, p630]
219.79.122.72 ( talk) 16:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change
* [[China–United States relations|China]] ** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]] * [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]] * [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]]
to
* [[China–United States relations|China]] ** [[Hong Kong–United States relations|Hong Kong]] ** [[Macau–United States relations|Macau]] * [[Japan–United States relations|Japan]]
since both Macau and Hong Kong are part of China (see Special administrative region of China). But the previous version only deems the latter to be, which is factually incorrect. 117.158.156.68 ( talk) 10:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could the flag icon please be removed in line with WP:ICONDECORATION? Thanks, 207.161.86.162 ( talk) 18:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
I currently have a draft waiting for review on the relations between Abkhazia and the United States. If it were to be accepted, on the foreign relations template for the United States, would a separate section have to be created in the bilateral section under the listing of former states? Or would it go under Asia Western where Georgia is listed under a double bullet point next to Georgia as the majority of countries view Abkhazia as part of Georgia? -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 19:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I'm curious about why Mexico is in the Central America section. I do understand that some geographic criteria give room for Mexico to be considered a part of such a region, but as far as my knowledge goes, Mexico is considered North American by both Mexicans themselves and Central Americans.
On the other hand, however, I wonder if this distinction in this particular template is based on a cultural background, since Canada shares far more cultural traits with the United States than Mexico does, and as such some people conisder North America a direct equivalent of Anglo-America (sans Caribbean countries).