This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brazil: Government and laws This template is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles This template is supported by the Government and Laws of Brazil task force. International relations This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles

I think we should remove the list of international organizations from this template... and leave only the bilateral, regional and multilateral organizations with specific articles on Brazil (like Brazilian-American relations, Brazil-Russia relations, Brazil and the UN, etc). It would look cleaner and less cluttered. Any opinions? Limongi 03:07, 18 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I say remove them unless you have a specific article called " Brazil and X" (e.g. Brazil and the Andean Community, etc. Also why the black font for half the countries, that's really annoying. Kevlar67 ( talk) 00:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply

That user NoonIcarus who is a Venezuelan is the worst. I mean he trimmed and created so many articles about Kosovo. His mistakes have to be corrected. Therefore I suggest that the article Kosovo-Brazil relations be redirected into the International recognition of Kosovo. There that's it. I will change the article now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:C53D:C27D:C4D2:E102:436C:9B91 ( talk) 19:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC) reply