![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I'm confused by the categorization this template yields. I propose to create Category:Ports and harbors of Florida, and place articles only in that category; that category, in turn, can be placed in Category:Ports and harbors of the United States and Category:Geography of Florida. (Adding it as a sub-category of Category:Water transport is redundant, since Category:Ports and harbors of the United States already belongs to that category (via Category:Ports and harbors -> Category:Ports and harbours by country). Thoughts? -- Tetraminoe 11:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Why does the name ("Infobox FLPorts") appear in the template itself? I find this a bit unneccesary and ugly. Can we remove it? -- Tetraminoe 11:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
The way the template is set up, all articles using the template will alphebetize in the category under P (for "Port" or "Port of"), rather than stripping the "Port" and alphebetize under the letter of their name (e.g. "Miami" or "Canaveral"). Any ideas for workarounds? -- Tetraminoe 12:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
As the template seems to be acting up, and we have an alphabetizing issue, what do you think of removing the cat include and manually adding the cat to port articles? Fix both problems at once, but is a little more work. KillerChihuahua ?!? 12:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I propose that we change the name of this template to Template:Florida ports, since
I further propose that we set a standard of similar naming for all FL templates. Thoughts? -- Tetraminoe 08:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Was Port St. Lucie never a real port? ℬastique▼ parℓer♥ voir♑ 22:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
The expanded template seems to dominate every article, causing a gap in the text and "looking funny." Is there any way to shrink the template? Smaller type, maybe? Inserting template under the lead? Please consider some form of relief for the reader. Student7 ( talk) 00:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
I'm confused by the categorization this template yields. I propose to create Category:Ports and harbors of Florida, and place articles only in that category; that category, in turn, can be placed in Category:Ports and harbors of the United States and Category:Geography of Florida. (Adding it as a sub-category of Category:Water transport is redundant, since Category:Ports and harbors of the United States already belongs to that category (via Category:Ports and harbors -> Category:Ports and harbours by country). Thoughts? -- Tetraminoe 11:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Why does the name ("Infobox FLPorts") appear in the template itself? I find this a bit unneccesary and ugly. Can we remove it? -- Tetraminoe 11:13, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
The way the template is set up, all articles using the template will alphebetize in the category under P (for "Port" or "Port of"), rather than stripping the "Port" and alphebetize under the letter of their name (e.g. "Miami" or "Canaveral"). Any ideas for workarounds? -- Tetraminoe 12:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
As the template seems to be acting up, and we have an alphabetizing issue, what do you think of removing the cat include and manually adding the cat to port articles? Fix both problems at once, but is a little more work. KillerChihuahua ?!? 12:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I propose that we change the name of this template to Template:Florida ports, since
I further propose that we set a standard of similar naming for all FL templates. Thoughts? -- Tetraminoe 08:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Was Port St. Lucie never a real port? ℬastique▼ parℓer♥ voir♑ 22:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
The expanded template seems to dominate every article, causing a gap in the text and "looking funny." Is there any way to shrink the template? Smaller type, maybe? Inserting template under the lead? Please consider some form of relief for the reader. Student7 ( talk) 00:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)