![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 366 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2016 May 3. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2020 October 3. The result of the discussion was " snowball keep". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2021 August 22. The result of the discussion was " snowball keep". |
Why do we even have this template to encourage use as a source in so many article when the site is user-editable and not reliable? I note the documentation says that more reliable sources should be used in preference if available. I don't remember WP:RS saying that unreliable sources are acceptable if that's all there is.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
I find a few of my Find a Grave source deleted because user see the write up that it is unreliable. After I undo the link deletion, it is deleted again. Is there a write up to others not to delete the link? I need some official write up on this template so that I could justify its existance. See John Bohn revision history. SWP13 ( talk) 21:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a ref parameter to pass through to Cite web so that they can be used in conjunction with
harv
,
{{harvid}}
and
{{sfnref}}
citations. Griceylipper ( talk) 12:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
{{Wikicite|ref={{harvid=Find a Grave}}|reference={{Find a Grave|1234|Henri Langlois}}}}
.References
The redirect
Template:Fag has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26 § Template:Fag until a consensus is reached.
MClay1 (
talk) 10:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 366 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2016 May 3. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2020 October 3. The result of the discussion was " snowball keep". |
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2021 August 22. The result of the discussion was " snowball keep". |
Why do we even have this template to encourage use as a source in so many article when the site is user-editable and not reliable? I note the documentation says that more reliable sources should be used in preference if available. I don't remember WP:RS saying that unreliable sources are acceptable if that's all there is.-- Pontificalibus ( talk) 16:36, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
I find a few of my Find a Grave source deleted because user see the write up that it is unreliable. After I undo the link deletion, it is deleted again. Is there a write up to others not to delete the link? I need some official write up on this template so that I could justify its existance. See John Bohn revision history. SWP13 ( talk) 21:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a ref parameter to pass through to Cite web so that they can be used in conjunction with
harv
,
{{harvid}}
and
{{sfnref}}
citations. Griceylipper ( talk) 12:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
{{Wikicite|ref={{harvid=Find a Grave}}|reference={{Find a Grave|1234|Henri Langlois}}}}
.References
The redirect
Template:Fag has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 26 § Template:Fag until a consensus is reached.
MClay1 (
talk) 10:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)