What is trivia is not obvious, despite the assumptions of WP:TRIVIA policy. The template needs a link to the article's talk page so that the editor there may explain what he/she considers being minor fictionrefs. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the template should have a link to WP:TRIVIA, instead of trivia. -- Fukumoto ( talk) 14:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Does this template take an extra parameter to distinguish between use directed at an article versus a mere section of an article? If it does, it's not obvious from the page detailing its use. 71.236.253.188 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
What is trivia is not obvious, despite the assumptions of WP:TRIVIA policy. The template needs a link to the article's talk page so that the editor there may explain what he/she considers being minor fictionrefs. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 12:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the template should have a link to WP:TRIVIA, instead of trivia. -- Fukumoto ( talk) 14:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Does this template take an extra parameter to distinguish between use directed at an article versus a mere section of an article? If it does, it's not obvious from the page detailing its use. 71.236.253.188 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)