This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The background colors now are changed, different from all bg colors as defined in {{
element color}}
. I do not get the reason to change a setting here, esp. since now the many periodic table variants are not consistent any more. -
DePiep (
talk) 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Not to oppose it, but could you, Double sharp, point to some reasons for changing this into a Pykko one? Just to improve my knowledge. - DePiep ( talk) 08:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
The s-block has 2 elements; p-block 6; d-block 10; f-block 14. The g-block should have 18 elements, but it actually has 20 according to this template. Why does it have 20?? Georgia guy ( talk) 21:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I have never, once in my life, seen a periodic table that does not use the symbols based on the systemic names, but uses numbers instead. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 18:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Any evidence supporting the possibility of element 184?? Georgia guy ( talk) 18:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
The limit of atomic number is 173. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.219.149.55 ( talk) 07:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I reverted edits like [1]. (which reinstalled eralier edits): [2]. I note:
Fricke, Greiner and Waber in their work declared, that element 164 will be possibly noble gas (even though it should be located under Hg or Pt). Shouldn't be colored in light cyan tone? -- Dvorapa ( talk) 12:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
User:DePiep did revert after I made template be of same style as Template:Periodic table (32 columns, compact). Comment was "rv. Nonsense. Your es is I do not understand (well, I se you mix up issues). Why not talk Proposals & Ideas?".
I don't see why is good faith edit in which template was widened to 100% to have consistency with parent template (used for elements before 119) regarded as "nonsense" and what is exactly meant by statement that my "es" (I guess this stands for edit summary) is "I do not understand".
So here is proposal (even if there was no [or I can't find it] proposal for main template improvement done by User:Matt Fitzpatrick). -- 5.43.78.13 ( talk) 23:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The colors of the s and g-blocks are too similar. Georgia guy ( talk) 14:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
As which table is the most likely to fit period 8/9 elements is still controversial, would it be possible instead to show the several proposed models (Pyykkö, Fricke, etc.) as collapsible sections inside the template? Chaotic Enby ( talk) 00:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The background colors now are changed, different from all bg colors as defined in {{
element color}}
. I do not get the reason to change a setting here, esp. since now the many periodic table variants are not consistent any more. -
DePiep (
talk) 21:56, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Not to oppose it, but could you, Double sharp, point to some reasons for changing this into a Pykko one? Just to improve my knowledge. - DePiep ( talk) 08:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
The s-block has 2 elements; p-block 6; d-block 10; f-block 14. The g-block should have 18 elements, but it actually has 20 according to this template. Why does it have 20?? Georgia guy ( talk) 21:28, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I have never, once in my life, seen a periodic table that does not use the symbols based on the systemic names, but uses numbers instead. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 18:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Any evidence supporting the possibility of element 184?? Georgia guy ( talk) 18:28, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
The limit of atomic number is 173. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.219.149.55 ( talk) 07:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I reverted edits like [1]. (which reinstalled eralier edits): [2]. I note:
Fricke, Greiner and Waber in their work declared, that element 164 will be possibly noble gas (even though it should be located under Hg or Pt). Shouldn't be colored in light cyan tone? -- Dvorapa ( talk) 12:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
User:DePiep did revert after I made template be of same style as Template:Periodic table (32 columns, compact). Comment was "rv. Nonsense. Your es is I do not understand (well, I se you mix up issues). Why not talk Proposals & Ideas?".
I don't see why is good faith edit in which template was widened to 100% to have consistency with parent template (used for elements before 119) regarded as "nonsense" and what is exactly meant by statement that my "es" (I guess this stands for edit summary) is "I do not understand".
So here is proposal (even if there was no [or I can't find it] proposal for main template improvement done by User:Matt Fitzpatrick). -- 5.43.78.13 ( talk) 23:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
The colors of the s and g-blocks are too similar. Georgia guy ( talk) 14:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
As which table is the most likely to fit period 8/9 elements is still controversial, would it be possible instead to show the several proposed models (Pyykkö, Fricke, etc.) as collapsible sections inside the template? Chaotic Enby ( talk) 00:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)