 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
In my experience, Microsoft Translator is more effective for German to English translation than Google Translate. Thoughts on a possible change? Cyborg4 :) ( talk) 10:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
The Expand French template page has a table of "recognized topics." Could we add that here too? Lugevas ( talk) 18:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now Google is proposed as a tools for translation from German.
"Google's machine translation is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia."
But https://www.deepl.com/translator is a lot more precise for German (and other language)
I propose to change the text like that: "Machine translation like Deepl or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia." Gagarine ( talk) 13:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Done @
Gagarine: I have made the change to
Template:Expand language which is used for many different languages. Can you confirm that this tool is relevant to all of them, otherwise we could look at reprogramming that template to distinguish between different languages. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk)
13:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The list of topics on this template is missing Military (code "mil"), and is missing the standard code "transp" for Transport. Numberguy6 ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Expand language has an RFC
Template:Expand language has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. -- N8wilson 11:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
In my experience, Microsoft Translator is more effective for German to English translation than Google Translate. Thoughts on a possible change? Cyborg4 :) ( talk) 10:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
The Expand French template page has a table of "recognized topics." Could we add that here too? Lugevas ( talk) 18:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Now Google is proposed as a tools for translation from German.
"Google's machine translation is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia."
But https://www.deepl.com/translator is a lot more precise for German (and other language)
I propose to change the text like that: "Machine translation like Deepl or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia." Gagarine ( talk) 13:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Done @
Gagarine: I have made the change to
Template:Expand language which is used for many different languages. Can you confirm that this tool is relevant to all of them, otherwise we could look at reprogramming that template to distinguish between different languages. — Martin (
MSGJ ·
talk)
13:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
| This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The list of topics on this template is missing Military (code "mil"), and is missing the standard code "transp" for Transport. Numberguy6 ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Expand language has an RFC
Template:Expand language has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. -- N8wilson 11:53, 5 June 2022 (UTC)