 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: This is completely uncontroversial. Sure, some templates have different naming schemes than articles, but this should be consistent with the topic here. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 00:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:EpsomDerby → Template:Epsom Derby – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 203.118.164.94 ( talk) 08:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - No rationale given. -- Bcp67 ( talk) 20:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is obvious. 203.118.164.94 ( talk) 22:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose templates have different naming conventions than articles. No clue why this is needed. Montanabw (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support as uncontroversial. Per WP:TMP, "template names are easiest to remember if they follow standard English spelling, spacing, and capitalization". Not sure why this requires discussion, the oppose !votes above hold no weight. PC78 ( talk) 18:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: This is completely uncontroversial. Sure, some templates have different naming schemes than articles, but this should be consistent with the topic here. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 00:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:EpsomDerby → Template:Epsom Derby – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. 203.118.164.94 ( talk) 08:09, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - No rationale given. -- Bcp67 ( talk) 20:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is obvious. 203.118.164.94 ( talk) 22:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose templates have different naming conventions than articles. No clue why this is needed. Montanabw (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support as uncontroversial. Per WP:TMP, "template names are easiest to remember if they follow standard English spelling, spacing, and capitalization". Not sure why this requires discussion, the oppose !votes above hold no weight. PC78 ( talk) 18:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.