![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I have just removed several links to non-existent articles. I do not believe that this template should be cluttered with a large number of red links. I think that links should only be added to the template for existing articles. What do others think? -- TimTay ( talk) 14:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
I think it would be useful for all the regional power station navigation templates to link to each other. To keep discussion in one place, please comment at Template talk:South East powerstations#Links to other regional powerstation navboxes rather than here. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
This navbox has several redlinks. Redlinks are not normally included as navboxes are seen as a way of linking articles on related topics. As the navbox appears on multiple articles it means these articles appear in cleanup listings as highly requested. I see this was discussed some years ago & the articles still haven't been created. Would there be any objection to making them plain black text until the relevant articles are created?— Rod talk 20:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I have just removed several links to non-existent articles. I do not believe that this template should be cluttered with a large number of red links. I think that links should only be added to the template for existing articles. What do others think? -- TimTay ( talk) 14:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
I think it would be useful for all the regional power station navigation templates to link to each other. To keep discussion in one place, please comment at Template talk:South East powerstations#Links to other regional powerstation navboxes rather than here. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
This navbox has several redlinks. Redlinks are not normally included as navboxes are seen as a way of linking articles on related topics. As the navbox appears on multiple articles it means these articles appear in cleanup listings as highly requested. I see this was discussed some years ago & the articles still haven't been created. Would there be any objection to making them plain black text until the relevant articles are created?— Rod talk 20:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)