![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2013 August 15. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
When the NAIT line opens, the Edmonton LRT will no longer be a single line. How will the route diagram be altered?
The diagram can be widened to accommodate more stations, like this:
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS3-2|RMq|RMq|RMq||[[118 Avenue, Edmonton|118 Avenue]]||O2=HALFVIADUCTr1|O3=uHALFVIADUCTl1}}
{{BS3-2|uexKBHFa|STR|uABZgr|[[NAIT (ETS)|NAIT]]|CN Spur End|(future)|O2=uSTR+l}}
{{BS3-2|uexBHF|uENDEe|uSTR|[[Kingsway (ETS)|Kingsway]]||(future)}}
{{BS3-2|uexBHF||uBHF|[[MacEwan (ETS)|MacEwan]]|[[Stadium (ETS)|Stadium]]|(future)}}
{{BS3-2|uextSTRa||utSTRa||}}
{{BS3-2|utexSTRlf|utABZrxl|utSTRr||}}
{{BS1-2|utBHF||[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]||12min}}
|}
|}
Or the two routes could each have their own diagrams, like this:
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT Route 201<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS2|RMq|RMq||[[118 Avenue, Edmonton|118 Avenue]]|O1=HALFVIADUCTr1|O2=uHALFVIADUCTl1}}
{{BS2|STR|uABZgr||CN Spur End|O1=uSTR+l}}
{{BS2|uENDEe|uBHF||[[Stadium (ETS)|Stadium]]}}
{{BS2||utSTRa||}}
{{BS2|utexCONTr|uteABZlg||[[:Template:ETS LRT route 202|LRT Route 202]] (future)}}
{{BS2||utBHF|12min|[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]}}
|}
|}
and
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT Route 202<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS2|uexKBHFa|||[[NAIT (ETS)|NAIT]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uexBHF|||[[Kingsway (ETS)|Kingsway]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uexBHF|||[[MacEwan (ETS)|MacEwan]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uextSTRa|||}}
{{BS2|uxtABZg+l|utCONTfq||[[:Template:ETS LRT route 201|LRT Route 201]]}}
{{BS2|utBHF|||[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]}}
{{BS2|utCONTf||}}
|}
|}
My vote is for the two separate diagrams, because as more extensions are built, the diagram will get more complicated. 117Avenue ( talk) 02:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
The diagram was been altered July 3, 2009, to the widened option with the announcement of the MacEwan station receiving funding. 117Avenue ( talk) 21:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Two-colour lines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I suggest added the future version with the Valley line to stations on the metro line, as it is the only one with good detail on it. Also rename the current route the ETS Capital Line LRT route, as it is the Capital Line route diagram. As soon as possible try to make a new template for the ETS Metro LIne LRT route. It should be added a soon as can be done to stations on the Metro Line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingeroscar ( talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Downtown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Redrose64, are you suggesting this? The problem with that is that they look like two parallel tracks, not two routes using the same tracks. Useddenim, could you please make a practical example? I've stripped down this template, to the right, you can see how close the stations are, and how little room there is to show two colours. Your example is either not to scale, or are you suggesting adding straight portions between stations? 117Avenue ( talk) 06:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Full colour | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I don't think there is anything more to say than in my last comment. If it is consensus to not include the stations that are not yet under construction, the crossings shouldn't be included either. 117Avenue ( talk) 18:52, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Also suggest, regarding this, that the "to Fort Saskatchewan" be removed. Haven't seen anything reliable confirming such as of yet (please do advise if something exists otherwise). These land use plans [1] [2] show its potential extension through Horse Hill into the Edmonton Energy and Technology Park with alternative alignment directions as it gets closer to the far northeast, but actual extension to the city boundary or beyond is not depicted. Hwy43 ( talk) 06:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't pretend to know how this template works, but I reverted this because it inexplicably made the Grandin/Government Centre label a smaller font size than all other stations. Not sure why we would make the font sizes across all stations inconsistent. Hwy43 ( talk) 15:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The CN spur line with the switch to the Capital Line was ripped up some time ago with the refurbishment of the 66 Street and 125 Avenue intersection, as part of the rebuilding of Fort Road. – Jwkozak91 ( talk) 00:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2013 August 15. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
When the NAIT line opens, the Edmonton LRT will no longer be a single line. How will the route diagram be altered?
The diagram can be widened to accommodate more stations, like this:
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS3-2|RMq|RMq|RMq||[[118 Avenue, Edmonton|118 Avenue]]||O2=HALFVIADUCTr1|O3=uHALFVIADUCTl1}}
{{BS3-2|uexKBHFa|STR|uABZgr|[[NAIT (ETS)|NAIT]]|CN Spur End|(future)|O2=uSTR+l}}
{{BS3-2|uexBHF|uENDEe|uSTR|[[Kingsway (ETS)|Kingsway]]||(future)}}
{{BS3-2|uexBHF||uBHF|[[MacEwan (ETS)|MacEwan]]|[[Stadium (ETS)|Stadium]]|(future)}}
{{BS3-2|uextSTRa||utSTRa||}}
{{BS3-2|utexSTRlf|utABZrxl|utSTRr||}}
{{BS1-2|utBHF||[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]||12min}}
|}
|}
Or the two routes could each have their own diagrams, like this:
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT Route 201<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS2|RMq|RMq||[[118 Avenue, Edmonton|118 Avenue]]|O1=HALFVIADUCTr1|O2=uHALFVIADUCTl1}}
{{BS2|STR|uABZgr||CN Spur End|O1=uSTR+l}}
{{BS2|uENDEe|uBHF||[[Stadium (ETS)|Stadium]]}}
{{BS2||utSTRa||}}
{{BS2|utexCONTr|uteABZlg||[[:Template:ETS LRT route 202|LRT Route 202]] (future)}}
{{BS2||utBHF|12min|[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]}}
|}
|}
and
{| {{Railway line header}}
{{Rail-header2|<big>Edmonton LRT Route 202<big>|#0093D0}}
{{BS-table}}
{{BS2|uexKBHFa|||[[NAIT (ETS)|NAIT]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uexBHF|||[[Kingsway (ETS)|Kingsway]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uexBHF|||[[MacEwan (ETS)|MacEwan]] (future)}}
{{BS2|uextSTRa|||}}
{{BS2|uxtABZg+l|utCONTfq||[[:Template:ETS LRT route 201|LRT Route 201]]}}
{{BS2|utBHF|||[[Churchill (ETS)|Churchill]]}}
{{BS2|utCONTf||}}
|}
|}
My vote is for the two separate diagrams, because as more extensions are built, the diagram will get more complicated. 117Avenue ( talk) 02:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
The diagram was been altered July 3, 2009, to the widened option with the announcement of the MacEwan station receiving funding. 117Avenue ( talk) 21:04, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Edmonton LRT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Two-colour lines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I suggest added the future version with the Valley line to stations on the metro line, as it is the only one with good detail on it. Also rename the current route the ETS Capital Line LRT route, as it is the Capital Line route diagram. As soon as possible try to make a new template for the ETS Metro LIne LRT route. It should be added a soon as can be done to stations on the Metro Line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingeroscar ( talk • contribs) 22:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Downtown | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Redrose64, are you suggesting this? The problem with that is that they look like two parallel tracks, not two routes using the same tracks. Useddenim, could you please make a practical example? I've stripped down this template, to the right, you can see how close the stations are, and how little room there is to show two colours. Your example is either not to scale, or are you suggesting adding straight portions between stations? 117Avenue ( talk) 06:13, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Full colour | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I don't think there is anything more to say than in my last comment. If it is consensus to not include the stations that are not yet under construction, the crossings shouldn't be included either. 117Avenue ( talk) 18:52, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Also suggest, regarding this, that the "to Fort Saskatchewan" be removed. Haven't seen anything reliable confirming such as of yet (please do advise if something exists otherwise). These land use plans [1] [2] show its potential extension through Horse Hill into the Edmonton Energy and Technology Park with alternative alignment directions as it gets closer to the far northeast, but actual extension to the city boundary or beyond is not depicted. Hwy43 ( talk) 06:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't pretend to know how this template works, but I reverted this because it inexplicably made the Grandin/Government Centre label a smaller font size than all other stations. Not sure why we would make the font sizes across all stations inconsistent. Hwy43 ( talk) 15:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The CN spur line with the switch to the Capital Line was ripped up some time ago with the refurbishment of the 66 Street and 125 Avenue intersection, as part of the rebuilding of Fort Road. – Jwkozak91 ( talk) 00:50, 26 January 2024 (UTC)