@ TompaDompa: thanks so much for your comprehensive review of the Rubicon article (the comments are of higher quality than most of the academic life science peer reviews I've seen).
Apologies if this talk page is not the right place for this discussion (if that's the case, please let me know).
RE your bulleted comments, I've accepted all of your suggestions, editing the article accordingly.
RE the DYK submission, where do we go from here? Should I edit it? You're right that the citation doesn't quite substantiate the hook; here is a new suggestion (inspired by your clever suggestion):
Prodigiousfool ( talk) 01:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
@ TompaDompa: thanks so much for your comprehensive review of the Rubicon article (the comments are of higher quality than most of the academic life science peer reviews I've seen).
Apologies if this talk page is not the right place for this discussion (if that's the case, please let me know).
RE your bulleted comments, I've accepted all of your suggestions, editing the article accordingly.
RE the DYK submission, where do we go from here? Should I edit it? You're right that the citation doesn't quite substantiate the hook; here is a new suggestion (inspired by your clever suggestion):
Prodigiousfool ( talk) 01:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)