![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
@
Nederlandse Leeuw: your template has no sources. If it remains unsourced after 7 days, I will start a discussion on the deletion of the template.
Veverve (
talk) 16:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Moreover, do you plan to put this template on numerous articles? If not, I believe a template is useless.
Veverve (
talk) 16:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Columns model example (apt for concise summary of consensus):
Book | Dating | Language | Authorship+location |
---|---|---|---|
Sirach | c. 180–175 BCE because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | Hebrew because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | Ben Sira in Jerusalem because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
Subrows model example (apt for elaborate explanation why scholars think xyz):
Book | Scholary consensus on origins |
---|---|
Sirach | Dating: c. 180–175 BCE because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
Language: Hebrew because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | |
Authorship+location: Ben Sira in Jerusalem because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
I would prefer the columns model: keeping the information concise so that it fits in three columns. Tables aren't meant for long stories anyway. What do you think? Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 16:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
@
Nederlandse Leeuw: your template has no sources. If it remains unsourced after 7 days, I will start a discussion on the deletion of the template.
Veverve (
talk) 16:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Moreover, do you plan to put this template on numerous articles? If not, I believe a template is useless.
Veverve (
talk) 16:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Columns model example (apt for concise summary of consensus):
Book | Dating | Language | Authorship+location |
---|---|---|---|
Sirach | c. 180–175 BCE because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | Hebrew because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | Ben Sira in Jerusalem because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
Subrows model example (apt for elaborate explanation why scholars think xyz):
Book | Scholary consensus on origins |
---|---|
Sirach | Dating: c. 180–175 BCE because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
Language: Hebrew because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah | |
Authorship+location: Ben Sira in Jerusalem because blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah |
I would prefer the columns model: keeping the information concise so that it fits in three columns. Tables aren't meant for long stories anyway. What do you think? Nederlandse Leeuw ( talk) 16:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)