 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I think all professional winners should be listed in the template, whether they have an article yet or not. Knope7 ( talk) 22:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think all (but only) professionals with articles should be listed in the template, whether they won or not.
anemone
projectors
19:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Non-winning professionals would include a lot of people who are unlikely to have articles in the future. At least with winners of the show notability is easier to establish and thus they are more likely to get articles at some point. Knope7 ( talk) 16:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
| This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I think all professional winners should be listed in the template, whether they have an article yet or not. Knope7 ( talk) 22:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think all (but only) professionals with articles should be listed in the template, whether they won or not.
anemone
projectors
19:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Non-winning professionals would include a lot of people who are unlikely to have articles in the future. At least with winners of the show notability is easier to establish and thus they are more likely to get articles at some point. Knope7 ( talk) 16:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)