![]() | This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Vandalism |
---|
{{ uw-vandalism1}}, {{ uw-vandalism2}}, {{ uw-vandalism3}}, {{ uw-vandalism4}}, {{ uw-vandalism4im}} |
Content removal |
{{ uw-delete1}}, {{ uw-delete2}}, {{ uw-delete3}}, {{ uw-delete4}} |
Testing |
{{ uw-test1}}, {{ uw-test2}}, {{ uw-test3}}, {{ uw-test4}} |
Spam linking |
{{ uw-spam1}}, {{ uw-spam2}}, {{ uw-spam3}}, {{ uw-spam4}} |
Other behavior |
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace |
Warning templates should always be used with the "subst:" keyword, as strongly suggested on Wikipedia:Template substitution. They are shown without subst here to reduce the display space occupied by this table, not to encourage their use without subst. For example, type {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}~~~~ (not {{uw-vandalism1}}) to warn common first-time vandals.
The levels of templates are:
Please do not use this template; use one of {{ uw-copyright1}} through {{ uw-copyright4}} instead.
Usage | Output |
---|---|
{{subst: Cv}} |
![]() |
{{subst: Cv|Article}}* |
![]() |
Should the template cover cases in which the person who makes the edit is the copyright holder? WP:COPY#Contributors.27 rights and obligations -- Usgnus 02:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I know that in some cases, subst is required due to limitations in MediaWiki ({{ prod}} being one such case), but this template doesn't seem to fall into that category, so why is subst recommended? - Harmil 19:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Vandalism |
---|
{{ uw-vandalism1}}, {{ uw-vandalism2}}, {{ uw-vandalism3}}, {{ uw-vandalism4}}, {{ uw-vandalism4im}} |
Content removal |
{{ uw-delete1}}, {{ uw-delete2}}, {{ uw-delete3}}, {{ uw-delete4}} |
Testing |
{{ uw-test1}}, {{ uw-test2}}, {{ uw-test3}}, {{ uw-test4}} |
Spam linking |
{{ uw-spam1}}, {{ uw-spam2}}, {{ uw-spam3}}, {{ uw-spam4}} |
Other behavior |
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace |
Warning templates should always be used with the "subst:" keyword, as strongly suggested on Wikipedia:Template substitution. They are shown without subst here to reduce the display space occupied by this table, not to encourage their use without subst. For example, type {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}~~~~ (not {{uw-vandalism1}}) to warn common first-time vandals.
The levels of templates are:
Please do not use this template; use one of {{ uw-copyright1}} through {{ uw-copyright4}} instead.
Usage | Output |
---|---|
{{subst: Cv}} |
![]() |
{{subst: Cv|Article}}* |
![]() |
Should the template cover cases in which the person who makes the edit is the copyright holder? WP:COPY#Contributors.27 rights and obligations -- Usgnus 02:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I know that in some cases, subst is required due to limitations in MediaWiki ({{ prod}} being one such case), but this template doesn't seem to fall into that category, so why is subst recommended? - Harmil 19:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)