![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2008 April 7. The result of the discussion was "no consensus to delete". |
"This template is mainly delimited to the listing at http://solidnet.org/redlink.html." Fair enough, but there are lots of parties missing from the template that are on the Solidnet list. Is there a reason for this? Grauniad100 ( talk) 17:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
If I get the chance I will see which are missing that have articles and add them. I added the NCP Britain which is part of the Solidnet group of parties already. Grauniad100 ( talk) 22:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I added Swiss Party of Labour --Arepo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arepo ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I had moved it, mainly because the supporters of the Tudeh Party themselves do not believe themselves to be bundled up with Middle Eastern Countries. I thought it would be alright, since Turkey is in the Europe section, rather than the middle east. Also, seeing as Iran is in Central Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.157.173 ( talk) 18:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I reverted this edit. In brief, if we use 'UK' then we need to include the Irish parties as well (which arguably operate in the UK). In the communist movement there was always a separation between British and Irish parties, and communists never organized themselves of the basis of the UK. -- Soman ( talk) 04:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Aside from not being on the solidnet list, is there any reason not to include the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) in the template? It is an officially recognized Canadian political party and has its own Wikipedia article. - Haunti Talk 05:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I have decided to be bold in breaking this template's tradition and add some European communist parties of note in countries that no longer exist. I'd do that for other countries, as well, but they aren't as well-documented. I invite people who have information on this to contribute. Lockesdonkey ( talk) 04:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Could someone Add this communist party in Argentina? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCCE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.51.149.252 ( talk) 03:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Looking to discuss the over-use of red on some templates at Portal talk:Communism#Template color discussion. Otr500 ( talk) 15:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose that prominent international organisations of communist parties, both current and historical, be included underneath the continents but before the related topics of the sidebar. Including but not limited to the IMCWP, WFDY and ICMLPO, as well as the Comintern and INITIATIVE. Given the composition of this sidebar mainly being Marxist–Leninist parties, these organisations should be mainly geared to that ideology, but I believe that, with the limited mention of some specifically Maoist and Trotskyist parties, some of their organisations and internationals should also be included. Here is a version of the sidebar to show what it would look like: /info/en/?search=User:Grettoonist/sandbox#Project_9:_Template:Communist_parties_international_organisations_section_edit
Open to any opinions on this inclusion. I would argue that while some of these organisations are already included in the standalone communism sidebar, the fact that these organisations were created to bring together parties mentioned above, it would make sense to include them in what is already a compilation of parties. @ Grettoonist ( talk) 18:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for deletion on 2008 April 7. The result of the discussion was "no consensus to delete". |
"This template is mainly delimited to the listing at http://solidnet.org/redlink.html." Fair enough, but there are lots of parties missing from the template that are on the Solidnet list. Is there a reason for this? Grauniad100 ( talk) 17:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
If I get the chance I will see which are missing that have articles and add them. I added the NCP Britain which is part of the Solidnet group of parties already. Grauniad100 ( talk) 22:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
I added Swiss Party of Labour --Arepo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arepo ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I had moved it, mainly because the supporters of the Tudeh Party themselves do not believe themselves to be bundled up with Middle Eastern Countries. I thought it would be alright, since Turkey is in the Europe section, rather than the middle east. Also, seeing as Iran is in Central Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.137.157.173 ( talk) 18:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I reverted this edit. In brief, if we use 'UK' then we need to include the Irish parties as well (which arguably operate in the UK). In the communist movement there was always a separation between British and Irish parties, and communists never organized themselves of the basis of the UK. -- Soman ( talk) 04:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Aside from not being on the solidnet list, is there any reason not to include the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) in the template? It is an officially recognized Canadian political party and has its own Wikipedia article. - Haunti Talk 05:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I have decided to be bold in breaking this template's tradition and add some European communist parties of note in countries that no longer exist. I'd do that for other countries, as well, but they aren't as well-documented. I invite people who have information on this to contribute. Lockesdonkey ( talk) 04:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Could someone Add this communist party in Argentina? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCCE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.51.149.252 ( talk) 03:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Looking to discuss the over-use of red on some templates at Portal talk:Communism#Template color discussion. Otr500 ( talk) 15:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose that prominent international organisations of communist parties, both current and historical, be included underneath the continents but before the related topics of the sidebar. Including but not limited to the IMCWP, WFDY and ICMLPO, as well as the Comintern and INITIATIVE. Given the composition of this sidebar mainly being Marxist–Leninist parties, these organisations should be mainly geared to that ideology, but I believe that, with the limited mention of some specifically Maoist and Trotskyist parties, some of their organisations and internationals should also be included. Here is a version of the sidebar to show what it would look like: /info/en/?search=User:Grettoonist/sandbox#Project_9:_Template:Communist_parties_international_organisations_section_edit
Open to any opinions on this inclusion. I would argue that while some of these organisations are already included in the standalone communism sidebar, the fact that these organisations were created to bring together parties mentioned above, it would make sense to include them in what is already a compilation of parties. @ Grettoonist ( talk) 18:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)