This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Civility redirect. |
|
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for merging with Template:Wikipedia essays on 17 December 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
I know I saw an essay called something like "Don't gang up on other editors and beat them up" which was quite good but now I can't find it. Does anyone know the name and should it be here? Thanks. CarolMooreDC ( talk) 03:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I've just fully protected this because of the revert war over the inclusion of an essay. Which essays to include should be determined by consensus here, please don't edit war. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | It seems clear that at this time consensus does not support linking the essay in the template. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC) |
Gravedancing, as well as false accusations of same, are clearly civility issues. Merridew doesn't like this essay because it calls a clear distinction between what is gravedancing and what is not gravedancing, and wants it hidden. I feel it's a legit issue that people ought to consider before they either edit the userpage of a blocked editor or before they accuse someone else who has edited user pages of blocked editors of gravedancing. Otherwise, the term is just a meaningless political club to attack people making good faith contributions. - Balph Eubank ✉ 18:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
This is a talk page pertinent to civility. Oh, the irony! ~ Amatulić ( talk) 21:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Pls see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for protection. Moxy ( talk) 21:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I've protected the page.
At this point, please civilly discuss. - jc37 22:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Behavior is clearly a part of civility. Would it be useful to put the Do and Don't sections under a behavior heading? Or maybe just get rid of the Dos and Don'ts and instead have a link to a more general "behavior" guideline? - Balph Eubank ✉ 19:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to edit this page so that I can add a link to an essay I created: WP:NCAYO. I believe it falls in this template on Wikipedia civility. Mr.Wikipediania ( Stalk • Talk) 02:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Mr.Wikipediania ( Stalk • Talk) 02:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
13:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)As promised by Joefromrandb, the socks and/or meatpuppets are out to revert war me. Someone who created an account 2 weeks ago? LOL. - Balph Eubank ✉ 16:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Given the very recent full protection of this template due to edit warring, we should really discuss any additions or removals here first. It's quite likely that some of these links should be removed, but we should discuss it first. Frietjes ( talk) 16:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Given that we have "Don't template the regulars" included, I would like to see Do template the regulars included as well (in the "Dos" section) for balance. -- No unique names 17:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. (Oh, sweet irony...) —
Mr. Stradivarius (
have a chat)
15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request "Just drop it" and "No angry mastodons" be moved from the "Don'ts" to the "Do"s. Each is a positive "Do" advice essay vs. "Don't" essay. Also, will give better balance to each subsection.
S. Rich ( talk) 20:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Essays#Template:Wikipedia essays, regarding the new(ish) Template:Wikipedia essays, that we're planning to completely replace this template (Using a bot-run, and then redirects).
Last week I replaced all project-space instances (31 transclusions) of {{
Humorous essays}} with {{
Wikipedia essays|humour}}
, without feedback, so I'm hoping the other 3 will go just as smoothly. Let us know there, soonish, if you have any comments/concerns. Thanks. –
Quiddity (
talk)
05:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I have just added Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Aspergers editors to the Basics group. It is basic, but I wondered if we ned a section for relationships with editors who are differently able? Fiddle Faddle 10:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Never thought there was so much nonsense on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelphillipr ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Civility redirect. |
|
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This template was considered for merging with Template:Wikipedia essays on 17 December 2013. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
I know I saw an essay called something like "Don't gang up on other editors and beat them up" which was quite good but now I can't find it. Does anyone know the name and should it be here? Thanks. CarolMooreDC ( talk) 03:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
I've just fully protected this because of the revert war over the inclusion of an essay. Which essays to include should be determined by consensus here, please don't edit war. Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | It seems clear that at this time consensus does not support linking the essay in the template. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC) |
Gravedancing, as well as false accusations of same, are clearly civility issues. Merridew doesn't like this essay because it calls a clear distinction between what is gravedancing and what is not gravedancing, and wants it hidden. I feel it's a legit issue that people ought to consider before they either edit the userpage of a blocked editor or before they accuse someone else who has edited user pages of blocked editors of gravedancing. Otherwise, the term is just a meaningless political club to attack people making good faith contributions. - Balph Eubank ✉ 18:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
This is a talk page pertinent to civility. Oh, the irony! ~ Amatulić ( talk) 21:47, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Pls see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for protection. Moxy ( talk) 21:31, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
I've protected the page.
At this point, please civilly discuss. - jc37 22:17, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Behavior is clearly a part of civility. Would it be useful to put the Do and Don't sections under a behavior heading? Or maybe just get rid of the Dos and Don'ts and instead have a link to a more general "behavior" guideline? - Balph Eubank ✉ 19:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to edit this page so that I can add a link to an essay I created: WP:NCAYO. I believe it falls in this template on Wikipedia civility. Mr.Wikipediania ( Stalk • Talk) 02:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Mr.Wikipediania ( Stalk • Talk) 02:54, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
13:25, 21 October 2012 (UTC)As promised by Joefromrandb, the socks and/or meatpuppets are out to revert war me. Someone who created an account 2 weeks ago? LOL. - Balph Eubank ✉ 16:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Given the very recent full protection of this template due to edit warring, we should really discuss any additions or removals here first. It's quite likely that some of these links should be removed, but we should discuss it first. Frietjes ( talk) 16:39, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Given that we have "Don't template the regulars" included, I would like to see Do template the regulars included as well (in the "Dos" section) for balance. -- No unique names 17:19, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
{{
edit protected}}
template. (Oh, sweet irony...) —
Mr. Stradivarius (
have a chat)
15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request "Just drop it" and "No angry mastodons" be moved from the "Don'ts" to the "Do"s. Each is a positive "Do" advice essay vs. "Don't" essay. Also, will give better balance to each subsection.
S. Rich ( talk) 20:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Essays#Template:Wikipedia essays, regarding the new(ish) Template:Wikipedia essays, that we're planning to completely replace this template (Using a bot-run, and then redirects).
Last week I replaced all project-space instances (31 transclusions) of {{
Humorous essays}} with {{
Wikipedia essays|humour}}
, without feedback, so I'm hoping the other 3 will go just as smoothly. Let us know there, soonish, if you have any comments/concerns. Thanks. –
Quiddity (
talk)
05:55, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
I have just added Wikipedia:High-functioning autism and Aspergers editors to the Basics group. It is basic, but I wondered if we ned a section for relationships with editors who are differently able? Fiddle Faddle 10:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Never thought there was so much nonsense on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelphillipr ( talk • contribs) 21:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)