![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Looking at an old archive of the RIANZ singles chart, it looks like certification thresholds were different in New Zealand during the early 2000s. According to this source, in 2003 singles were awarded gold and platinum for sales of 5,000 and 10,000 copies, respectively. But I don't know when this levels were changed, and we also should check if this applies for albums too. -- Stee888 ( talk) 22:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Stee888, Harout72, I don't know if either of you are still active or following this thread, but I've been looking up some information, and in addition to the old singles certification levels mentioned above, they were different again between 1978 and 1992:
I have a reliable reference to prove the first two certification levels. Is there anybody available to make the necessary changes to the template to take account of these three different levels over the history of NZ singles certification? Richard3120 ( talk) 16:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Richard, would it be possible for you to scan the cover page of the Dean Scapolo's book as well as all of the pages that show the certification levels for singles and the dates when the levels were amended. I compile Gold/Platinum certifications for hundreds of artists mainly to list them at the List of best-selling music artists, and it would be great if I could use that book as a reference to apply correct levels to all singles released between 1978-1992.-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Harout72:@ JG66: an update... I did manage to get a sneaky picture of the relevant page of the NZ book, and although you need to zoom in, it's perfectly readable. It states quite clearly that certifications began in July 1978, and were halved in 1992 – the actual sales numbers for certification are not given, but the 1992–2007 levels of 5,000/10,000 are available on archived versions of the RIANZ website (for example http://web.archive.org/web/20020806213312/http://www.rianz.org.nz/top50.cfm, bottom left corner), and therefore we can double these levels to get the 1978–1991 levels (does this count as WP:OR?). So the question now is, how do I get this photo to you guys? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Is it worth thinking about splitting this final column of the template into two? I know it doesn't happen very often, but occasionally it is possible to provide both the number of certified units (i.e. combined sales + streaming) and sales-only figures. For example, in the UK " Black Magic" has been certified platinum by the BPI for 600,000 certified units, but the Official Charts Company have stated that its sales amount stands at 477,824 as of October 2016. This has led to arguments as to what figure should be included in the "Certified units/sales" column – we have a "salesamount" parameter but if editors prefer the certified units figure because it's higher, this makes the "salesamount" parameter redundant. What do other editors think... have the column as "certified units" as standard, and then if a sales amount figure becomes available, add a sales column as optional additional information? But I don't know if adding an optional column is possible with this template. Richard3120 ( talk) 21:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
This template seems to be a leading cause of duplicate reference definition errors. Is anything being done to prevent erroneous usage, or to help diagnose the problems this template causes? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 13:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The RIAA certification allows Diamond for regular certifications, but not for Latin-certified albums by the RIAA. The threshold is 1,000,000 if it was certified before December 2013 and 600,000 after December 2013. Here's a source to show that it exists. Erick ( talk) 18:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
@ John of Reading: It's been a few months and there are several recording that have been Diamante. The template does not input the Diamond value for Latin certification. The Latin certifications for singles also need to be addressed because it lists shipments for some singles when the RIAA has only certified Latin digital singles. Erick ( talk) 22:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you John. I really appreciate your help. :) Erick ( talk) 16:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Could someone update the Brazil sales for digital albums and singles? Per Pro-Música Brasil website, Gold stands for 50,000 copies, Platinum stands for 100,000 and Diamond stands for 500,000 copies. These sales are for albums and singles released or certificated (in cases as " Vogue", " SOS" and " Express Yourself") after 2008. Music01 ( talk) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Can some one please correct the Canadian video sales listing in {{ Certification Table Entry/Sales}}? Currently its listed along with the singles and hence when added as Platinum, it takes the sales as 100,000 whereas according to Music Canada platinum in the country for videos is 10,000. — IB [ Poke ] 08:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
When I tried to update the certification for Italy for Greatest Hits (Neil Young album), the number of sales given is wrong. Adding the release year in the template 2004 gives me 50,000 sales. However, Greatest Hits went Gold in 2017, which means the number of sales is 25,000. If I change the release year to 2014, the correct sales is provided. Is there a way to prevent this? Thanks. -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 01:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The link to Dutch certifications at NVPI has been dead now for the best part of two years, and it doesn't look as though it's going to be reactivated any time soon. There is an archived version of the search page available, but as you can't then search for anything from that archived page, it's of no use.
My concern is that at present, if you click on the citation for the Dutch certification in an article, it doesn't even take you to an error page on the NVPI website, but now takes you through a series of pop-up ad pages instead – surely not something that Wikipedia should be linking to. So the question is, should we remove all Dutch certifications from the certification table, wherever they occur in song/album articles? It appears that there are around 400 articles that include the Dutch certification template, so it's not a huge number that would take many months to remove. Or should we just leave them there to avoid disruption, but somehow disable the citation link or change it to "citation needed" instead? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering if Muhandes could simply write a line which would disable the use of this Netherlands template for both singles and albums so that it doesn't show up in any related articles, which would be quicker than deleting it article by article, and also allow for it to be re-enabled in future, should NVPI ever decide to show certifications again. Richard3120 ( talk) 19:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that while filling out the Sweden sales for Stronger (Britney Spears song) that the link for gold/platinum CDs and singles in 2000 doesn't work. However, I've found an archived copy on the IA [5]. I was wondering if other Sweden charts require an archived link. -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 00:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
relyear
parameter must match certyear
so that the archived links are shown. Any idea what could be causing this?
snapsnap (
talk)
20:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@ SnapSnap: no, it doesn't. Here is an example with relyear=1999 and certyear=2010:
{{Certification Table Top}} {{Certification Table Entry|award=Gold|region=Sweden|type=single|certyear=2010|relyear=1999}} {{Certification Table Bottom|nosales=yes}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Sweden ( GLF) [1] | Gold | 15,000‡ |
^ Shipments figures based on certification alone. |
References
-- Muhandes ( talk) 18:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Certification Table Top}} {{Certification Table Entry|award=Gold|region=Sweden|type=single|certyear=2015|relyear=1999|artist=Muhandes|title=Yes!}} {{Certification Table Bottom|nosales=yes}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Sweden ( GLF) [1] | Gold | 15,000‡ |
^ Shipments figures based on certification alone. |
References
-- Muhandes ( talk) 20:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Cite certification|region=Norway|artist=Coldplay|certyear=2001}} {{Cite certification|region=Norway|artist=Coldplay|certyear=2015}}
"IFPI Norsk platebransje Trofeer 1993–2011" (in Norwegian). IFPI Norway.
"Norwegian certifications – Coldplay" (in Norwegian). IFPI Norway.
-- Muhandes ( talk) 09:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Muhandes: Based on my research, Denmark IFPI has been applying their most recent certification levels to albums and singles to both newer and older releases since July 2012. This rule seems to have been on their site since July 2012, see where it says Certificeringer sker altid efter de gældende kriterier, uanset hvornår udgivelsen er udgivet. Note that June 2012 doesn't have that statement yet. So, currently recently certified albums like Madonna's Confessions on the Dance Floor shows up with double the actual sales amount.
Also, the singles' levels since November 17, 2014 were Gold=30,000, Platinum=60,000. Since April 1, 2017 are Gold=45,000, Platinum=90,000. These levels have not been implemented into the template. We need to enter the correct levels manually otherwise, it reads 0. Hopefully, you'll have the time to make these changes.-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Since March 2017 there are new regulation for singles certification in Poland (Gold = 20,000, Platinum = 40,000, Diamond = 200,000). Could someone please update this? zpav.pl -- Xxvid ( talk) 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Since 7 July 2017, streaming is inlcuded in Italian albums charts and certifications, as stated here. We should therefore change the footnote for albums, but it's quite intricate since it depends on the month (awards are given every Friday, and 7 July was the first Friday of July, therefore we can avoid to consider the certday as a parameter), or on the certification week. Moreover, all entires for Italian album certifications until now do not include a certmonth parameter (or anything similar). How can we accomplish this? Stee888 ( talk) 20:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Certification definitions in Canada changed around the middle of the last year. Eurohunter ( talk) 08:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
certyear
/certmonth
/certday
) and change accordingly. If certification was before September 12, 2016 use the former values, unless digital
is specified. If it is after that date, use the current values. When the certification date is not specified I think we would use the old values. Does this sound right? --
Muhandes (
talk)
22:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
How do I use this template with the {{ Failed verification}} template? I try to do so here and it doesn't seem to work. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 16:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
certref
field, so using {{
Certification Cite Ref}} directly you can do:{{Certification Table Entry|region=United States|relyear=2006|certyear=2006|title=Buttons|artist=Pussycat Dolls|autocat=yes|type=single|award=Platinum|accessdate=August 12, 2013|certref={{Certification Cite Ref|region=United States|title=Buttons|artist=Pussycat Dolls|type=single}}{{fv}}}}<pre>
Which creates:
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
United States ( RIAA) [1] failed verification | Platinum | 1,000,000^ |
* Sales figures based on certification alone. |
References
Hi. The website that posts the weekly charts for Portugal, will now post certifications (started with the most recent week and will update the archive also). So I think the template should be updated, and use this website as reference (since the one that used to be there was removed from the web). The certifications also need to be updated. Singles: 5000 copies for Gold and 10000 for Platinum; Albums - 7500 for Gold and 15000 for Platinum. Thanks! ManuelButera ( talk) 15:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Can someone help me? I've been trying to fix the Greek certification on American Life, but it's not working. Basically, the reference link (#121) gets redirected to this page page instead of this page. I've included the id tag but it's still not working. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks in advance. -- WWETrishMickiefan ( talk) 03:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
type=album
we link to chart01.htm
and if type=single
we link to chart03.htm
. Are there cases where the link should be to chart04.htm
? --
Muhandes (
talk)
12:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
chart04.htm
is the overall Greek charts, that takes into account both foreign and domestic (Greek) albums, while chart01.htm
is the chart for foreign albums only. Nonetheless, chart04.htm
has archived pages that are missing on chart01.htm
. For example, the
American Life certification is archived only under chart04.htm
, but I can't find it under chart01.htm
. --
WWETrishMickiefan (
talk)
21:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
domestic
variable such that if domestic=true
we go to chart04.htm
and if domestic=false
(or not listed) we go, like now, to chart01.htm
? --
Muhandes (
talk)
17:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
domestic
variable is already used, to indicate a domestic release. This influences the sales amount, as you can see from my sandbox implementation:{{Certification Table Top}} {{User:Muhandes/Certification Table Entry|region=Greece|type=album|id=20070114174502|award=Gold|relyear=2006|artist=Someone}} {{User:Muhandes/Certification Table Entry|region=Greece|type=album|id=20070114174502|domestic=true|award=Gold|relyear=2006|artist=Someone Else}} {{Certification Table Bottom}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Greece ( IFPI Greece) [1] | Gold | 7,500^ |
Greece ( IFPI Greece) [2] | Gold | 15,000^ |
* Sales figures based on certification alone. |
References
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Looking at an old archive of the RIANZ singles chart, it looks like certification thresholds were different in New Zealand during the early 2000s. According to this source, in 2003 singles were awarded gold and platinum for sales of 5,000 and 10,000 copies, respectively. But I don't know when this levels were changed, and we also should check if this applies for albums too. -- Stee888 ( talk) 22:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Stee888, Harout72, I don't know if either of you are still active or following this thread, but I've been looking up some information, and in addition to the old singles certification levels mentioned above, they were different again between 1978 and 1992:
I have a reliable reference to prove the first two certification levels. Is there anybody available to make the necessary changes to the template to take account of these three different levels over the history of NZ singles certification? Richard3120 ( talk) 16:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Richard, would it be possible for you to scan the cover page of the Dean Scapolo's book as well as all of the pages that show the certification levels for singles and the dates when the levels were amended. I compile Gold/Platinum certifications for hundreds of artists mainly to list them at the List of best-selling music artists, and it would be great if I could use that book as a reference to apply correct levels to all singles released between 1978-1992.-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
@ Harout72:@ JG66: an update... I did manage to get a sneaky picture of the relevant page of the NZ book, and although you need to zoom in, it's perfectly readable. It states quite clearly that certifications began in July 1978, and were halved in 1992 – the actual sales numbers for certification are not given, but the 1992–2007 levels of 5,000/10,000 are available on archived versions of the RIANZ website (for example http://web.archive.org/web/20020806213312/http://www.rianz.org.nz/top50.cfm, bottom left corner), and therefore we can double these levels to get the 1978–1991 levels (does this count as WP:OR?). So the question now is, how do I get this photo to you guys? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Is it worth thinking about splitting this final column of the template into two? I know it doesn't happen very often, but occasionally it is possible to provide both the number of certified units (i.e. combined sales + streaming) and sales-only figures. For example, in the UK " Black Magic" has been certified platinum by the BPI for 600,000 certified units, but the Official Charts Company have stated that its sales amount stands at 477,824 as of October 2016. This has led to arguments as to what figure should be included in the "Certified units/sales" column – we have a "salesamount" parameter but if editors prefer the certified units figure because it's higher, this makes the "salesamount" parameter redundant. What do other editors think... have the column as "certified units" as standard, and then if a sales amount figure becomes available, add a sales column as optional additional information? But I don't know if adding an optional column is possible with this template. Richard3120 ( talk) 21:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
This template seems to be a leading cause of duplicate reference definition errors. Is anything being done to prevent erroneous usage, or to help diagnose the problems this template causes? -- Mikeblas ( talk) 13:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The RIAA certification allows Diamond for regular certifications, but not for Latin-certified albums by the RIAA. The threshold is 1,000,000 if it was certified before December 2013 and 600,000 after December 2013. Here's a source to show that it exists. Erick ( talk) 18:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
@ John of Reading: It's been a few months and there are several recording that have been Diamante. The template does not input the Diamond value for Latin certification. The Latin certifications for singles also need to be addressed because it lists shipments for some singles when the RIAA has only certified Latin digital singles. Erick ( talk) 22:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you John. I really appreciate your help. :) Erick ( talk) 16:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Could someone update the Brazil sales for digital albums and singles? Per Pro-Música Brasil website, Gold stands for 50,000 copies, Platinum stands for 100,000 and Diamond stands for 500,000 copies. These sales are for albums and singles released or certificated (in cases as " Vogue", " SOS" and " Express Yourself") after 2008. Music01 ( talk) 17:36, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Can some one please correct the Canadian video sales listing in {{ Certification Table Entry/Sales}}? Currently its listed along with the singles and hence when added as Platinum, it takes the sales as 100,000 whereas according to Music Canada platinum in the country for videos is 10,000. — IB [ Poke ] 08:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
When I tried to update the certification for Italy for Greatest Hits (Neil Young album), the number of sales given is wrong. Adding the release year in the template 2004 gives me 50,000 sales. However, Greatest Hits went Gold in 2017, which means the number of sales is 25,000. If I change the release year to 2014, the correct sales is provided. Is there a way to prevent this? Thanks. -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 01:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
The link to Dutch certifications at NVPI has been dead now for the best part of two years, and it doesn't look as though it's going to be reactivated any time soon. There is an archived version of the search page available, but as you can't then search for anything from that archived page, it's of no use.
My concern is that at present, if you click on the citation for the Dutch certification in an article, it doesn't even take you to an error page on the NVPI website, but now takes you through a series of pop-up ad pages instead – surely not something that Wikipedia should be linking to. So the question is, should we remove all Dutch certifications from the certification table, wherever they occur in song/album articles? It appears that there are around 400 articles that include the Dutch certification template, so it's not a huge number that would take many months to remove. Or should we just leave them there to avoid disruption, but somehow disable the citation link or change it to "citation needed" instead? Richard3120 ( talk) 23:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering if Muhandes could simply write a line which would disable the use of this Netherlands template for both singles and albums so that it doesn't show up in any related articles, which would be quicker than deleting it article by article, and also allow for it to be re-enabled in future, should NVPI ever decide to show certifications again. Richard3120 ( talk) 19:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
I've noticed that while filling out the Sweden sales for Stronger (Britney Spears song) that the link for gold/platinum CDs and singles in 2000 doesn't work. However, I've found an archived copy on the IA [5]. I was wondering if other Sweden charts require an archived link. -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 00:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
relyear
parameter must match certyear
so that the archived links are shown. Any idea what could be causing this?
snapsnap (
talk)
20:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@ SnapSnap: no, it doesn't. Here is an example with relyear=1999 and certyear=2010:
{{Certification Table Top}} {{Certification Table Entry|award=Gold|region=Sweden|type=single|certyear=2010|relyear=1999}} {{Certification Table Bottom|nosales=yes}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Sweden ( GLF) [1] | Gold | 15,000‡ |
^ Shipments figures based on certification alone. |
References
-- Muhandes ( talk) 18:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Certification Table Top}} {{Certification Table Entry|award=Gold|region=Sweden|type=single|certyear=2015|relyear=1999|artist=Muhandes|title=Yes!}} {{Certification Table Bottom|nosales=yes}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Sweden ( GLF) [1] | Gold | 15,000‡ |
^ Shipments figures based on certification alone. |
References
-- Muhandes ( talk) 20:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
{{Cite certification|region=Norway|artist=Coldplay|certyear=2001}} {{Cite certification|region=Norway|artist=Coldplay|certyear=2015}}
"IFPI Norsk platebransje Trofeer 1993–2011" (in Norwegian). IFPI Norway.
"Norwegian certifications – Coldplay" (in Norwegian). IFPI Norway.
-- Muhandes ( talk) 09:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
@ Muhandes: Based on my research, Denmark IFPI has been applying their most recent certification levels to albums and singles to both newer and older releases since July 2012. This rule seems to have been on their site since July 2012, see where it says Certificeringer sker altid efter de gældende kriterier, uanset hvornår udgivelsen er udgivet. Note that June 2012 doesn't have that statement yet. So, currently recently certified albums like Madonna's Confessions on the Dance Floor shows up with double the actual sales amount.
Also, the singles' levels since November 17, 2014 were Gold=30,000, Platinum=60,000. Since April 1, 2017 are Gold=45,000, Platinum=90,000. These levels have not been implemented into the template. We need to enter the correct levels manually otherwise, it reads 0. Hopefully, you'll have the time to make these changes.-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Since March 2017 there are new regulation for singles certification in Poland (Gold = 20,000, Platinum = 40,000, Diamond = 200,000). Could someone please update this? zpav.pl -- Xxvid ( talk) 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Since 7 July 2017, streaming is inlcuded in Italian albums charts and certifications, as stated here. We should therefore change the footnote for albums, but it's quite intricate since it depends on the month (awards are given every Friday, and 7 July was the first Friday of July, therefore we can avoid to consider the certday as a parameter), or on the certification week. Moreover, all entires for Italian album certifications until now do not include a certmonth parameter (or anything similar). How can we accomplish this? Stee888 ( talk) 20:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Certification definitions in Canada changed around the middle of the last year. Eurohunter ( talk) 08:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
certyear
/certmonth
/certday
) and change accordingly. If certification was before September 12, 2016 use the former values, unless digital
is specified. If it is after that date, use the current values. When the certification date is not specified I think we would use the old values. Does this sound right? --
Muhandes (
talk)
22:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
How do I use this template with the {{ Failed verification}} template? I try to do so here and it doesn't seem to work. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 16:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
certref
field, so using {{
Certification Cite Ref}} directly you can do:{{Certification Table Entry|region=United States|relyear=2006|certyear=2006|title=Buttons|artist=Pussycat Dolls|autocat=yes|type=single|award=Platinum|accessdate=August 12, 2013|certref={{Certification Cite Ref|region=United States|title=Buttons|artist=Pussycat Dolls|type=single}}{{fv}}}}<pre>
Which creates:
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
United States ( RIAA) [1] failed verification | Platinum | 1,000,000^ |
* Sales figures based on certification alone. |
References
Hi. The website that posts the weekly charts for Portugal, will now post certifications (started with the most recent week and will update the archive also). So I think the template should be updated, and use this website as reference (since the one that used to be there was removed from the web). The certifications also need to be updated. Singles: 5000 copies for Gold and 10000 for Platinum; Albums - 7500 for Gold and 15000 for Platinum. Thanks! ManuelButera ( talk) 15:00, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Can someone help me? I've been trying to fix the Greek certification on American Life, but it's not working. Basically, the reference link (#121) gets redirected to this page page instead of this page. I've included the id tag but it's still not working. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks in advance. -- WWETrishMickiefan ( talk) 03:14, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
type=album
we link to chart01.htm
and if type=single
we link to chart03.htm
. Are there cases where the link should be to chart04.htm
? --
Muhandes (
talk)
12:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
chart04.htm
is the overall Greek charts, that takes into account both foreign and domestic (Greek) albums, while chart01.htm
is the chart for foreign albums only. Nonetheless, chart04.htm
has archived pages that are missing on chart01.htm
. For example, the
American Life certification is archived only under chart04.htm
, but I can't find it under chart01.htm
. --
WWETrishMickiefan (
talk)
21:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
domestic
variable such that if domestic=true
we go to chart04.htm
and if domestic=false
(or not listed) we go, like now, to chart01.htm
? --
Muhandes (
talk)
17:58, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
domestic
variable is already used, to indicate a domestic release. This influences the sales amount, as you can see from my sandbox implementation:{{Certification Table Top}} {{User:Muhandes/Certification Table Entry|region=Greece|type=album|id=20070114174502|award=Gold|relyear=2006|artist=Someone}} {{User:Muhandes/Certification Table Entry|region=Greece|type=album|id=20070114174502|domestic=true|award=Gold|relyear=2006|artist=Someone Else}} {{Certification Table Bottom}}
Region | Certification | Certified units/sales |
---|---|---|
Greece ( IFPI Greece) [1] | Gold | 7,500^ |
Greece ( IFPI Greece) [2] | Gold | 15,000^ |
* Sales figures based on certification alone. |
References