This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This new template looks good, but I have a few observations/suggestions to help improve it.
Good job overall. - BillCJ 21:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Forgive my confusion, but shouldn't the CH-148 be listed under future aircraft? And why is the CH-147 listed under future aircraft? I was going to make these changes (either moving or deleting CH-147, but I'm not absolutely certain of its current status), but I thought I'd check here first. -- Craig ( t| c) 02:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest reverting to the list with the current aircraft section. Seems the norm for other air force templates on wiki. The other template is not easy to read, as it includes past aircraft. 87.113.25.103 ( talk) 21:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the first suggestion, including aircraft would make it consistent with the other templates for the CF (i.e. MARCOM and Land Force Command). 24.211.187.223 ( talk) 20:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
This template should include the aircraft, otherwise its just a list of bases. Bmpower ( talk) 13:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This new template looks good, but I have a few observations/suggestions to help improve it.
Good job overall. - BillCJ 21:51, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Forgive my confusion, but shouldn't the CH-148 be listed under future aircraft? And why is the CH-147 listed under future aircraft? I was going to make these changes (either moving or deleting CH-147, but I'm not absolutely certain of its current status), but I thought I'd check here first. -- Craig ( t| c) 02:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest reverting to the list with the current aircraft section. Seems the norm for other air force templates on wiki. The other template is not easy to read, as it includes past aircraft. 87.113.25.103 ( talk) 21:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the first suggestion, including aircraft would make it consistent with the other templates for the CF (i.e. MARCOM and Land Force Command). 24.211.187.223 ( talk) 20:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
This template should include the aircraft, otherwise its just a list of bases. Bmpower ( talk) 13:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)