This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the Operation Hush link because it was never executed. It would be appropriate for inclusion in a box, but the Passchendaele family of articles currently doesn't have one.-- Labattblueboy ( talk) 07:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd like it back in because of its influence on the operations that did take place. Keith-264 ( talk) 20:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone object to me altering the title of the campaignbox to The Flanders Offensive 1917 so that the contents can be labelled The Battle of Messines and The Battles of Ypres (with or without ", 1917")? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 12:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Article titles beginning with Action of... are ones with no obvious label in the RS, except for 22 October, which has this as a map title in a divisional history. I took as a precedent because Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Military history has "Non-neutral terms such as "attack", "slaughter", "massacre" or "raid" should be used with care." so I moved the other titles from attack... for continuity. Keith-264 ( talk) 10:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the Operation Hush link because it was never executed. It would be appropriate for inclusion in a box, but the Passchendaele family of articles currently doesn't have one.-- Labattblueboy ( talk) 07:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd like it back in because of its influence on the operations that did take place. Keith-264 ( talk) 20:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone object to me altering the title of the campaignbox to The Flanders Offensive 1917 so that the contents can be labelled The Battle of Messines and The Battles of Ypres (with or without ", 1917")? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 12:30, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Article titles beginning with Action of... are ones with no obvious label in the RS, except for 22 October, which has this as a map title in a divisional history. I took as a precedent because Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Military history has "Non-neutral terms such as "attack", "slaughter", "massacre" or "raid" should be used with care." so I moved the other titles from attack... for continuity. Keith-264 ( talk) 10:25, 5 April 2017 (UTC)