This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / South Pacific / British / Chinese / Dutch / European / Japanese / North America / Southeast Asia / United States / World War II This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force British military history task force Chinese military history task force Dutch military history task force European military history task force Japanese military history task force North American military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

My reasoning in removing Japan campaign is that I think we should follow the Allied commands/theater definitions in campaignboxes and "Japan" therefore should be separate from "Pacific Ocean". The Volcano and Ryūkyū Islands campaign, Iwo Jima and Okinawa could be in both as they were under Nimitz's Pacific Ocean Areas (command), whereas the Japan campaign operations (US strategic bomber units, Operation Downfall etc) were under the direct control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Grant65 | Talk 03:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply

If so, then the Japan campaign probably needs to be listed in the overall "Pacific War" campaign box. Cla68 04:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply

Good point. Grant65 | Talk 05:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply