This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Theology / Reformed Christianity / Arminianism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles This template is supported by theology work group. This template is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity. This template is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Why is Pelagianism in this template? I know Calvinists often accuse Arminians of being Semi-Pelagian or Pelagian. (And, indeed, some Arminians may be.) But why is that in this template? I know Arminians often accuse Calvinists of being Antinomian. (And, indeed, some Calvinists may be.) Why not add Antinomianism to this template too? I say remove Pelagianism from this template (create a separate Pelagianism template) or be fair and add Antinomianism. TuckerResearch ( talk) 20:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

To editor Tuckerresearch: I think that Pelagianism was added more because this old controversy was referred to later in the Calvinism/Arminian debate. But of course it is historically a separate debate, then yes, Pelagianism is not 100% relevant in this footer, and it can be removed. --- Telikalive ( talk) 10:20, 26 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Removed, then. TuckerResearch ( talk) 14:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Now that there is an Arminianism footer, I suggest to create rather a Calvinism footer to avoid redundancy.--- Telikalive ( talk) 16:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC) reply