 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It is not sustainable to have this template to be named "Cabinet of India", instead it has to be renamed or copied to "Manmohan Singh Ministry" or something else that suggests the term of the current cabinet. User: Numancia —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- The article Cabinet of India is sustainable, and it's supporting navbox named "Cabinet of India" is not sustainable!-- Mrutyunjaya Kar ( talk) 03:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the navbox "Cabinet of India", the current name has to be changed to "Ministry of Manmohan Singh" or "Cabinet of Manmohan Singh" so that it represents the current Cabinet of India. Which would be sustainable, considering the everchanging nature of cabinet. -- User: Numancia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelled ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It is not sustainable to have this template to be named "Cabinet of India", instead it has to be renamed or copied to "Manmohan Singh Ministry" or something else that suggests the term of the current cabinet. User: Numancia —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
- The article Cabinet of India is sustainable, and it's supporting navbox named "Cabinet of India" is not sustainable!-- Mrutyunjaya Kar ( talk) 03:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the navbox "Cabinet of India", the current name has to be changed to "Ministry of Manmohan Singh" or "Cabinet of Manmohan Singh" so that it represents the current Cabinet of India. Which would be sustainable, considering the everchanging nature of cabinet. -- User: Numancia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelled ( talk • contribs) 16:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)