This template is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Centralized discussions
No major discussions are open at the moment
Doesn't the discussion of the scope of the project count as a major discussion. If not, what would qualify? Will Bebacktalk 00:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Definitely qualifies as a major discussion. Feel free to add a neutrally worded link--please comment out the current item for easy restoral. Thanks. –
Lionel(
talk) 10:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
That's beyond my pay grade. Could we ask the Wikiprojject leader to do it? ;) Will Bebacktalk 10:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Centralized discussions
No major discussions are open at the moment
Doesn't the discussion of the scope of the project count as a major discussion. If not, what would qualify? Will Bebacktalk 00:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Definitely qualifies as a major discussion. Feel free to add a neutrally worded link--please comment out the current item for easy restoral. Thanks. –
Lionel(
talk) 10:34, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply
That's beyond my pay grade. Could we ask the Wikiprojject leader to do it? ;) Will Bebacktalk 10:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)reply